...
首页> 外文期刊>Intestinal research. >Analysis of Colonoscopy Quality in Clinical Practices of Korea: Cohort Study of Patients Referred to Tertiary Hospital after Colonoscopy Examinations
【24h】

Analysis of Colonoscopy Quality in Clinical Practices of Korea: Cohort Study of Patients Referred to Tertiary Hospital after Colonoscopy Examinations

机译:韩国临床实践中结肠镜检查质量分析:结肠镜检查后转诊至三级医院的患者的队列研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background/Aims Although the quality of colonoscopy is considered important to improve screening efficacy, there is little evidence and few statistical reports which properly reflects the colonoscopy quality of clinical practices in Korea. We aimed to investigate the quality indicators of colonoscopy performing in clinical practice. Methods We analyzed the computerized photo-documentation files of patients who were transferred to tertiary academic hospital from private clinics or primary and secondary hospitals from January 2012 to October 2012. Quality indicators including cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, bowel preparation status, colonoscopy report form were analyzed. Bowel preparation was assessed by 4 steps on the preparation scale (excellent, good, fair, poor). Results A total of 198 patients (134 male, 64 female) were enrolled and analyzed. Cecal intubation rate was 91.4% (181/198) and photo-documentation of appendiceal orifice and ileocecal valve was achieved as 84.3% (167/198) and 71.7% (142/198), relatively. Overall, 83.3% of cases were adequate bowel preparation state (excellent 52%, good 31.3%). Withdrawal time could be estimated at 94.4% (187/198) of cases and mean withdrawal time of diagonostic colonoscopy (n=165) was 8.6 minutes. However, the rate of cases which withdrawal time was more than 6 minutes was 69.7% (115/165). Total of 30 institution's colonoscopy report forms were analyzed and among nearly half enrolled institutions (46.6%, 14/30) were just recording patient's information and colonoscopic diagnosis. Conclusions Considerable portion of colonoscopy examination in the primary clinical practice has been performed with low procedure quality. We thus need careful attention to maintain the quality of colonoscopy in daily practice routines.
机译:背景/目的尽管结肠镜检查的质量被认为对提高筛查效率很重要,但很少有证据和统计报告能正确反映韩国临床实践中结肠镜检查的质量。我们旨在调查临床实践中进行结肠镜检查的质量指标。方法分析2012年1月至2012年10月从私家诊所或基层和二级医院转入三级学术医院的患者的计算机化照片文件。质量指标包括盲肠插管率,停药时间,肠准备状况,结肠镜检查报告表被分析。肠道准备工作按准备量表上的4个步骤进行评估(优,良,良,差)。结果共纳入198例患者(男134例,女64例)。盲肠插管率为91.4%(181/198),相对而言阑尾孔和回盲瓣的照相记录分别为84.3%(167/198)和71.7%(142/198)。总体而言,有83.3%的患者处于适当的肠道准备状态(优秀52%,良好31.3%)。退出时间估计为94.4%(187/198),并且对角结肠镜检查的平均退出时间(n = 165)为8.6分钟。但是,退出时间超过6分钟的病例率为69.7%(115/165)。总共分析了30个机构的结肠镜检查报告表格,在将近一半的注册机构中(46.6%,14/30)仅记录患者的信息和结肠镜检查。结论在主要临床实践中,相当大一部分的结肠镜检查已经以较低的手术质量进行。因此,我们在日常练习中需要特别注意保持结肠镜检查的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号