首页> 外文期刊>Intestinal research. >A Double-Blind, Randomized, Active Drug Comparative, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Probiotics (Bacillus licheniformis, Zhengchangsheng? capsule) in Patients with Diarrhea
【24h】

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Active Drug Comparative, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Probiotics (Bacillus licheniformis, Zhengchangsheng? capsule) in Patients with Diarrhea

机译:一项双盲,随机,活性药物比较,平行组,多中心临床研究,以评估腹泻患者中益生菌(地衣芽孢杆菌,正肠生胶囊)的安全性和有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aims Bacillus Licheniformis , a probiotic used in the treatment of diarrhea, has been shown to suppress the growth of pathologic bacteria. This study was performed to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Zhengchangsheng? ( Bacillus Licheniformis ) in comparison with another probiotic, Bioflor? ( Saccharomyces Boulardii ) for the treatment of diarrhea. Methods Patients with diarrhea (n=158) were randomized to receive Zhengchangsheng? or Bioflor? for 5 days. The existence or non-existence of formed feces, changes in daily stool frequency, improvement of subjective symptoms, and changes in the severity of diarrhea were compared. Results Of the 158 full analysis set (FAS) patient population, 151 patients comprised the per protocol (PP) analysis. The rates of recovered to formed feces in the Bacillus and Saccharomyces groups were 91.0% vs. 95.0% in the FAS ( P =0.326) and 90.5% vs. 96.1% in the PP analysis ( P =0.169), respectively. The mean duration of diarrhea changing to formed feces was 3.15±1.10 days in the Bacillus group and 3.22±1.01 in the Saccharomyces group ( P =0.695, FAS). The frequency of defecation, subjective symptoms, and degree of severe diarrhea were improved in both groups, however, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Analysis of the 95% confidence intervals for the differences in the rate of recovery to formed feces between the 2 groups met the criteria for non-inferiority of Bacillus compared to Saccharomyces . No significant adverse events were observed during the study period. Conclusions Zhengchangsheng? is not inferior to Bioflor? in therapeutic efficacy and is a safe and useful therapeutic agent for the treatment of diarrhea.
机译:背景/目的地衣芽孢杆菌(Bacillus Licheniformis)是一种用于治疗腹泻的益生菌,已被证明可以抑制病理细菌的生长。进行这项研究以评估正肠生?的疗效和安全性。 (地衣芽孢杆菌)与另一种益生菌Bioflor进行比较? (Saccharomyces Boulardii)用于治疗腹泻。方法随机抽取腹泻患者(158例)进行正肠升?还是Bioflor? 5天。比较形成粪便的存在与否,每日大便次数的变化,主观症状的改善以及腹泻的严重程度的变化。结果在158个完整分析集(FAS)的患者人群中,有151个患者进行了按方案(PP)分析。芽孢杆菌和酿酒酵母组的粪便中形成粪便的回收率分别为91.0%,FAS中为95.0%(P = 0.326)和PP分析中分别为90.5%和96.1%(P = 0.169)。芽孢杆菌组腹泻变为粪便的平均持续时间为3.15±1.10天,酿酒酵母组为3.22±1.01(P = 0.695,FAS)。两组的排便频率,主观症状和严重腹泻程度均得到改善,但是两组之间在统计学上没有显着差异。两组之间形成粪便的恢复率差异的95%置信区间分析符合芽孢杆菌与酵母菌相比具有非劣效性的标准。在研究期间未观察到重大不良事件。结论正昌盛?不亚于Bioflor?具有治疗效果,是治疗腹泻的安全有效的治疗剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号