...
首页> 外文期刊>Intestinal research. >Differences in the public medical insurance systems for inflammatory bowel disease treatment in Asian countries
【24h】

Differences in the public medical insurance systems for inflammatory bowel disease treatment in Asian countries

机译:亚洲国家治疗炎症性肠病的公共医疗保险制度的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aims The cost of caring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is high. Without government support, the cost burden will unavoidably rest on the patients and their family. However, the government providing full support will place a large financial burden on the health-care systems of a country. The aim of this study is to understand the current status of public medical insurance systems in caring for IBD patients among Asian countries. Methods Questionnaires inquiring about the availability of public health systems; medical, diagnostic, and endoscopy costs; and coverage rate of biologics use were designed and sent to IBD experts in each of the Asian countries studied. The results were summarized according to the feedback from the responders. Results The public health insurance coverage rate is high in Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, China, Hong Kong, and Singapore; but low in Malaysia and India. This probably affected the use of expensive medications mostly, such as biologics, as we found that the percentage of Crohn's disease (CD) treated with biologics were as high as 30%–40% in Japan, where the government covers all expenses for IBD patients. In India, the percentage maybe as low as 1% for CD patients, most of whom need to pay for the biologics themselves. Conclusions There were differences in the public health insurance systems among the Asian countries studied. This reportprovidesthe background information to understand the differences in the treatment of IBD patients among Asian countries.
机译:背景/目的炎性肠病(IBD)患者的护理费用很高。没有政府的支持,费用负担将不可避免地落在患者及其家人身上。但是,政府提供的全面支持将给一个国家的医疗保健系统带来沉重的经济负担。这项研究的目的是了解亚洲国家中公共医疗保险系统在照料IBD患者方面的现状。方法问卷调查员询问公共卫生系统的可用性;医疗,诊断和内窥镜检查费用;设计和使用生物制剂的覆盖率并发送给研究的每个亚洲国家的IBD专家。根据响应者的反馈总结了结果。结果台湾,日本,韩国,中国大陆,香港和新加坡的公共健康保险覆盖率很高;但在马来西亚和印度比较低。这可能影响了大多数昂贵药物的使用,例如生物制剂,因为我们发现在日本,用生物制剂治疗的克罗恩病(CD)的比例高达30%–40%,其中政府负担了IBD患者的所有费用。在印度,CD患者的百分比可能低至1%,其中大多数患者需要自己购买生物制剂。结论在所研究的亚洲国家之间,公共健康保险体系存在差异。本报告提供了背景信息,以了解亚洲国家中IBD患者治疗的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号