首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >An evaluation of the clinical utility of mangled extremity severity score in severely injured lower limbs
【24h】

An evaluation of the clinical utility of mangled extremity severity score in severely injured lower limbs

机译:下肢严重度下肢严重度评分的临床应用评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The management of severe lower limb injury is one of the most controversial subjects in the field of Orthopedic surgery. While the advancement of sophisticated microsurgical reconstruction technique has created the possibility of successful limb salvage in even the most extreme cases, it has become painfully obvious that the technical possibilities are double-edged swords. The aim of study was to analyze and ascertain the clinical utility of mangled extremity severity score (MESS) in severely injured lower limbs. Methods: The current study was undertaken in the Department of Orthopedics among 50 patients who sustained high-energy injuries and approached a tertiary care center to seek care. The study design included both retrospective and prospective evaluation. Retrospectively 25 and prospectively 25 lower limbs in 54 patients with high-energy injuries were evaluated using mangled extremity severity score to assist in the decision-making process for the care of patients with such injuries. MESS served as study tool. Differences between the mean MESS scores for amputated and salvaged limbs were explored. Results: Crush injury of leg with fracture of tibia and fibula was observed in 78% of injured limbs. The most common mechanism of injury was high-energy trauma. Road traffic accidents accounted for 72% of patients. Mean hospitalization for primary amputation was 19.3 (8-26) days and for delayed amputation limbs was 36.6 (15-62) days and for salvaged limbs was 45.5 (14-128) days. In the prospective study, out of 7 injured limbs with a MESS score of equal or more than 7, 6 limbs were amputated and 1 limb was salvaged. Out of the remaining 18 injured limbs with a MESS score of less than 7, 17 limbs were successfully salvaged and one limb was amputated. In the retrospective study, 10 injured limbs with a MESS score of equal or more than 7 were amputated (mean score 8.4 with range of 10-8) and the remaining 15 injured limbs with a MESS score of less than 7 were salvaged (mean score 4.57 with range of (4-6)); suggesting a significant difference in the mean scores. Conclusions: MESS is a cost-effective, relatively simple and readily available scoring system, which assists the surgeon to identify variables that may ultimately influence the outcome of a severely traumatized extremity with arterial compromise due to high-energy injury.
机译:背景:严重的下肢损伤的治疗是整形外科领域中最具争议的主题之一。尽管先进的显微外科手术重建技术的发展为即使在最极端的情况下成功进行肢体抢救创造了可能性,但令人痛苦的是,显而易见的是,技术可能性是双刃剑。该研究的目的是分析和确定下肢严重受伤的肢体严重程度评分(MESS)的临床应用。方法:本研究是在骨科进行的,研究对象是50名遭受高能量伤害的患者,他们去了三级护理中心寻求治疗。研究设计包括回顾性评估和前瞻性评估。回顾性分析54例高能损伤患者的25个下肢和前瞻性25个下肢,使用四肢严重程度评分来评估护理此类患者的决策过程。 MESS作为学习工具。探讨了截肢和救助肢体的平均MESS得分之间的差异。结果:78%的受伤肢体中观察到腿部胫骨和腓骨骨折的挤压伤。最常见的损伤机制是高能创伤。道路交通事故占病人的72%。首次截肢的平均住院时间为19.3(8-26)天,延迟截肢的平均住院时间为36.6(15-62)天,挽救的肢体的平均住院时间为45.5(14-128)天。在这项前瞻性研究中,在MESS评分等于或高于7的7个受伤肢体中,有6个肢体被截肢,其中1个肢体得到了挽救。在MESS得分低于7的其余18条受伤肢体中,成功挽救了17条肢体,并截肢了一条肢体。在回顾性研究中,截肢了10个MESS得分等于或大于7的受伤肢体(平均得分8.4,范围为10-8),其余15个MESS得分小于7的受伤肢体被挽救了(平均得分4.57,范围为(4-6));提示平均得分存在显着差异。结论:MESS是一种经济有效的,相对简单且易于获得的评分系统,可帮助外科医生确定变量,这些变量最终可能会影响因高能损伤而导致严重创伤的肢体的动脉损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号