...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Preventive Medicine >Improving Participants’ Retention in a Smoking Cessation Intervention Using a Community-based Participatory Research Approach
【24h】

Improving Participants’ Retention in a Smoking Cessation Intervention Using a Community-based Participatory Research Approach

机译:使用基于社区的参与性研究方法来提高参与者对戒烟干预的保留率

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: This study compares participant’ sretention in three phases of smoking cessation interventions, one provided in a health clinic and the subsequent two in community-based settings. Methods: Smoking cessation interventions were conducted in three phases from 2008 to 2015 in two underserved urban communities with low socioeconomic profiles and high rates of smoking ( n = 951). Phase I was conducted in a clinic; Phases II and III were conducted in community venues. In Phases II and III, incremental changes were made based on lessons learned from the previous phases. Retention (attending six or more sessions) was the primary predictor of cessation and was analyzed while controlling for associated factors including age, gender, race, employment, education, and nicotine dependence. Results: Retention increased substantially over the three phases, with rates for attending six or more sessions of 13.8%, 51.9%, and 67.9% in Phases I, II, and III, respectively. Retention was significantly higher in community settings than in the clinic setting (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 6.7; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 4.6, 9.8). In addition to the intervention in community venues, predictors of retention included age and unemployment. Higher retention was significantly associated with higher quit rates (adjusted OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.5, 3.8). Conclusions: Conducting the intervention in community settings using trained peer motivators rather than health-care providers resulted in significantly higher retention and smoking cessation rates. This was due in part to the ability to tailor cessation classes in the community for specific populations and improving the quality of the intervention based on feedback from participants and community partners.
机译:背景:这项研究比较了参与者在戒烟干预的三个阶段中的保留程度,一个阶段是在卫生诊所中进行的,随后两个阶段是在社区环境中进行的。方法:从2008年至2015年,在两个社会经济状况低,吸烟率高的未得到充分服务的城市社区中分三个阶段进行了戒烟干预(n = 951)。第一阶段是在诊所进行的;第二阶段和第三阶段在社区场所进行。在第二阶段和第三阶段,根据先前阶段的经验教训进行了增量更改。保留(参加六次或更多次会议)是戒烟的主要预测指标,并在控制相关因素(包括年龄,性别,种族,就业,教育和尼古丁依赖)的同时进行了分析。结果:在三个阶段中,保留率显着提高,参加六个或更多次会议的比率在第一,第二和第三阶段分别为13.8%,51.9%和67.9%。社区环境中的保留率显着高于诊所环境(调整后的优势比[OR] = 6.7; 95%置信区间[CI] = 4.6、9.8)。除了对社区场所的干预外,保留率的预测因素还包括年龄和失业率。更高的保留率与更高的退出率显着相关(调整后的OR = 2.4; 95%CI = 1.5,3.8)。结论:在社区环境中使用受过训练的同伴动因而不是卫生保健提供者进行干预,可以显着提高保留率和戒烟率。这部分是由于能够根据特定人群针对社区量身定制戒烟班,并能够根据参与者和社区合作伙伴的反馈提高干预质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号