首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >Incorporating Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Worldviews Through Innovative Text Analysis: An Evaluation of Indigenous Public Health Curricula
【24h】

Incorporating Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Worldviews Through Innovative Text Analysis: An Evaluation of Indigenous Public Health Curricula

机译:通过创新的文本分析纳入土著和非土著世界观:对土著公共卫生课程的评价

获取原文
       

摘要

In Australia, graduates of Master of Public Health (MPH) programs are expected to achieve a set of core competencies, designed to ensure they will be culturally safe practitioners when working with Indigenous communities. This study reviewed a sample of MPH programs to determine the level of integration that has been achieved since these core competencies were developed. In this article, we will focus on the innovative data analysis process used for the reviews. The reviews were undertaken by a national network of leading academics in Indigenous public health, including those from both Indigenous and non-Indigenous backgrounds. As each review team consisted of different members from the network, there was a need to ensure consistency in the data analysis process across all the reviews. The researchers chose to use the Leximancer V4 qualitative software data analysis tool to enhance the validity of the study outcomes. One of the limitations found using this approach was that the Indigenous voice was underrepresented in the output from the software tool; hence, a manual thematic analysis was subsequently applied to the discussion threads, to identify themes within the findings. By combining the conceptual and thematic analysis, the research team was able to bridge the gap created by the weaknesses of the two data analysis methods and incorporate both the Indigenous and non-Indigenous worldviews to the interpretation of the findings, while maintaining consistency throughout the review process.
机译:在澳大利亚,预计公共卫生硕士(MPH)计划的毕业生将获得一系列核心能力,以确保他们在与土著社区合作时成为文化安全的从业者。这项研究回顾了MPH计划的样本,以确定自开发这些核心能力以来所达到的整合水平。在本文中,我们将重点介绍用于审阅的创新数据分析过程。审查由土著公共卫生领域的领先学者组成的全国网络进行,其中包括来自土著和非土著背景的学者。由于每个审核小组都由网络中的不同成员组成,因此需要确保所有审核的数据分析过程的一致性。研究人员选择使用Leximancer V4定性软件数据分析工具来增强研究结果的有效性。使用这种方法发现的局限性之一是,在软件工具的输出中,土著语音的表达不足。因此,随后对讨论主题进行了手动主题分析,以识别调查结果中的主题。通过将概念分析和主题分析相结合,研究团队能够弥合两种数据分析方法的弱点所造成的差距,并将土著和非土著世界观纳入对结果的解释中,同时在整个审查过程中保持一致处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号