...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Program of integrated geriatric and primary care for frail older adults in the community. An innovation case
【24h】

Program of integrated geriatric and primary care for frail older adults in the community. An innovation case

机译:社区脆弱的老年人的老年和初级保健综合方案。创新案例

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background : Frailty is a multidimensional geriatric syndrome, characterized by increased vulnerability to internal and external stressors, determining a risk of rapidly progressing disability (Fried LP et al., J Gerontol MS 2001). Consistent evidence shows multi-component interventions interventions can revert frailty and prevent disability (TM Gill et al, Arch Intern Med. 2006; Pahor M, et al, JAMA 2014). Successful interventions pivot on tailored programs based on exercise, nutrition and comprehensive geriatric assessment, with an individualized plan (Fairhall N, et al, BMC Geriatr. 2008). Coordination and integration between Primary Care and Geriatrics has been piloted with promising results (Vellas B, et al, 2013). We created a specialized geriatric outpatient unit in a primary care center, with the aim of improving the management of frail older adults at the community level, through integrated detection and individualized intervention between primary care and geriatrics. The general goal is to delay mobility disability, but we are also assessing other healthcare related, patient experience and costs outcomes. The unit also can also provide support to primary care for the management of patients with complex needs or difficult management. In this paper we present baseline characteristics of older adults evaluated in the unit during the first 3 months of functioning. In parallel, we are conducting a 1 and 3 months triple aim evaluation looking at disability and other health related outcomes, patients experience and costs. Methods : Population: frail older adults of the Primary Care area Bordeta, in Barcelona (total population of 30829 people, 26,5% over 65 years old, estimated prevalence of frailty around 10% from epidemiological studies). Intervention : participants are detected by the primary care team (physicians, nurse, social worker) for the presence of signs and symptoms of frailty (slowness of walking, reduced strength or endurance, sedentary habits, unintentional weight loss, suspect of cognitive impairment, possibly associated with reduced social relations), and referred to the geriatric team (geriatrician and physical therapist), which operates in the Primary Care center 1 day/week. The geriatric team revised the appropriateness of the screening through the Gerontopole Frailty Screening Tool (GFST) (including the objective measure of gait speed) and confirms frailty, scoring for severity, using Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Based on an eventual comprehensive geriatric assessment, the geriatrician identifies problems and priorities, and, together with the physical therapist, proposes an individualized treatment plan, including physical exercise as one pillar. The primary care professionals (physician, nurse, social worker) can join the assessment visit and share the treatment plan if they wish. The physical therapists offers a 8 weeks, weekly group exercise program focused on functional exercises, directed to engage, motivate and empower the participant. One follow-up visit is scheduled to adjust the plan and monitor the progresses of the person, who is followed, after that visit, by the primary care team. Outcomes: improvement of physical function (measured using SPPB) at the end of the program and 3 months, the evolution of global function (Barthel index), the reduction of the number of prescriptions, the use of healthcare resources, any potential adverse effect related to physical activity, and patients experience (specific interviews). Results : According to preliminary descriptive data of the first 30 patients included (first 3 months of implementation), the selection was adequate (100% of patients screened positive to the GFST, 54% were vulnerable or mild frail at CFS, mean SPPB±SD was 6.4±2.37, and mean gait speed±SD was 0.65±1.27). The vast majority of patients received one or more interventions within the treatment plan (exercise groups 93%, health education / nutrition 93%, 67% change in drug treatment, referral to study cognitive impairment 17%). Conclusions : We think that our experience is innovative, because it implements, in the real world, a new specialized and multidimensional model of care for frail older adults in the community, through an intervention individually modulated according to specific needs. We also think this is sustainable and scalable, since it counts on existing resources. The integration between geriatrics and primary care should add value for the intervention.
机译:背景:虚弱是一种多维的老年综合症,其特征是对内部和外部压力源的脆弱性增加,确定了快速发展的残疾的风险(Fried LP等人,J Gerontol MS 2001)。一致的证据表明,多成分干预措施可以恢复体弱并预防残疾(TM Gill等人,Arch Intern Med。2006; Pahor M等人,JAMA 2014)。成功的干预措施取决于基于锻炼,营养和全面的老年医学评估的个性化计划,并有个性化的计划(Fairhall N等,BMC Geriatr。2008)。已经试行了初级保健和老年医学之间的协调和整合,并取得了可喜的成果(Vellas B等,2013)。我们在基层医疗中心建立了一个专门的老年病门诊部,旨在通过基层医疗和老年病之间的综合检测和个性化干预,改善社区一级体弱的老年人的管理。总体目标是延迟行动不便,但我们也在评估其他与医疗保健相关的患者经验和费用结果。该部门还可以为需要复杂或管理困难的患者提供初级保健支持。在本文中,我们介绍了在工作的前3个月中在本机中评估的老年人的基线特征。同时,我们正在进行为期1个月和3个月的三重目标评估,以评估残疾和其他与健康相关的结局,患者的经验和费用。方法:人口:巴塞罗那初级保健区Bordeta的身体衰弱的老年人(总人口30829,在65岁以上人群中占26.5%,根据流行病学研究估计,身体脆弱的患病率约为10%)。干预:初级保健团队(医师,护士,社工)会检测到参与者是否存在体弱的体征和症状(行走缓慢,力量或耐力降低,久坐的习惯,无意减肥,怀疑有认知障碍) (与减少的社会关系相关),并转介给在初级保健中心每天工作1天的老年医疗队(老年科医生和物理治疗师)。老年医学团队使用短物理性能电池(SPPB)和临床虚弱量表(CFS)通过Gerontopole虚弱筛查工具(GFST)修改了筛查的适当性(包括步态速度的客观测量),并确认了虚弱,严重程度评分。 。在最终的全面老年医学评估的基础上,老年医生会确定问题和优先事项,并与理疗师一起提出个性化的治疗计划,其中应包括体育锻炼作为一个支柱。初级保健专业人员(医师,护士,社会工作者)可以参加评估访问并分享他们的治疗计划。物理治疗师每周提供为期8周的小组锻炼计划,重点是功能锻炼,旨在吸引,激励和增强参与者的能力。计划进行一次后续访问,以调整计划并监视患者的进度,该患者在访问之后由初级保健团队跟踪。结果:在计划结束时和三个月内,身体功能得到改善(使用SPPB进行测量),整体功能得到发展(Barthel指数),处方数量减少,医疗资源的使用,任何与之相关的潜在不良反应身体活动和患者的经历(特定的访谈)。结果:根据前30例患者的初步描述性数据(实施的头3个月),选择就足够了(100%的患者对GFST筛查呈阳性,54%的患者在CFS时脆弱或轻度虚弱,平均SPPB±SD为6.4±2.37,平均步态速度±SD为0.65±1.27。绝大多数患者在治疗计划内接受了一项或多项干预措施(运动组为93%,健康教育/营养为93%,药物治疗发生了67%的变化,转介研究认知障碍的为17%)。结论:我们认为我们的经验是创新的,因为它在现实世界中通过根据具体需要进行单独调整的干预措施,在社区中实施了一种新的专业化多维多维护理模式,以照顾社区中体弱的老年人。我们还认为这是可持续和可扩展的,因为它依靠现有资源。老年医学和初级保健之间的整合应增加干预的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号