首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >The affect of a pilot Discharge to Assess process on unscheduled care performance
【24h】

The affect of a pilot Discharge to Assess process on unscheduled care performance

机译:飞行员出院评估流程对计划外护理绩效的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study was conducted after introduction of a Discharge to Assess process to improve patient flow in Aneurin Bevan University Health Board in Wales which cares for 650 000 people. The main hospital sites for urgent care are at the Royal Gwent Hospital and Nevill Hall Hospital. The pilot was started in February 2017 at Nevill Hall. Unscheduled care performance in Welsh Hospitals is reported daily to the Integrated Unscheduled Care Dashboard in the National Health Service.It is a traffic light reporting system of green (Level 1), yellow (Level 2), amber (level 3) and red (Level 4) situation reports (SITREPs), where Level 4 reports greatest problems in escalation status of the hospital. The Discharge to Assess process involved safely discharging medically fit patients from hospital within 48 hours of being deemed safe to discharge and avoided unnecessary prolonged hospital stays which result in harm to frail and elderly patients.It is common for prolonged hospital stay to result in increased frailty of patients and increased mortality from events such as hospital acquired pneumonias. The independently reported Unscheduled Care Dasboard was analysed for hospital performance of Nevill Hall and Royal Gwent hospitals for May through to January inclusively for 2016 (prior to the pilot project) and the same months for 2017 (during the process). Data was also analysed for August 2018 after the pilot had ended. Data on SITREPs was collected for all days during the study periods from the Unscheduled Care Dasboard and numerical data assigned , green 1, yellow 2, amber 3 and red 4. The data was analysed and paired for SITREPs on the same date for each month in the study period for 2016 and 2017 using paired t test. The SITREP for Nevill Hall Hospital during the pilot period for seven of the nine months analysed was significantly improved compared to the SITREP before the pilot project (2016). The SITREP for Nevill Hall Hospital was significantly better for the months studied for 2017 during the Discharge to Assess process compared to the SITREP for Royal Gwent Hospital (where there was no participation of the pilot) for same months of 2016 and 2017. The pilot ended in July 2018. The SITREP data was interrogated for August 2018 for Nevill Hall Hospital and the findings were that the escalation status had reverted to that seen prior to the Discharge to Assess pilot study. This study shows significant benefits on a Discharge to Assess process on improving patient flow and improving hospital performance in managing unscheduled care.
机译:这项研究是在威尔士的Aneurin Bevan大学卫生委员会采用“评估出院”流程以改善患者流量之后进行的,该委员会照顾65万人。急诊的主要医院地点在皇家根特医院和内维尔大厅医院。该飞行员于2017年2月在Nevill Hall开始活动。威尔士医院的计划外护理表现每天都会报告给国家卫生局的综合计划外护理仪表盘,它是一种绿色(1级),黄色(2级),黄色(3级)和红色(3级)的交通信号报告系统。 4)情况报告(SITREPs),其中级别4报告医院升级状态中的最大问题。出院评估过程涉及在被认为可以安全出院的48小时内安全地将符合医疗条件的患者从医院出院,并避免不必要的长期住院时间对脆弱和老年患者造成伤害。长期住院会导致身体虚弱病人数量增加,以及因医院获得性肺炎等事件导致的死亡率增加。独立报告的计划外护理仪表板分析了2016年5月至1月(包括该试点项目之前)和2017年同月(该过程中)Nevill Hall和Royal Gwent医院的医院绩效。试点结束后还分析了2018年8月的数据。在研究期间,从计划外护理仪表板上收集了整天的SITREPs数据,并分配了数字数据(绿色1,黄色2,琥珀色3和红色4)。对每个月的同一日期的SITREPs进行了分析和配对。使用配对t检验的2016年和2017年研究期。与试点项目之前(2016年)相比,在分析的九个月中的七个月的试点期内,内维尔大厅医院的SITREP有了显着改善。相比于2016年和2017年同月,Royal Gwent医院的SITREP(无试点参与),Nevill Hall医院的SITREP在2017年进行的评估评估月份显着改善。于2018年7月对NITILL HALL医院的SITREP数据进行了2018年8月的调查,结果发现升级状态已恢复为“出院评估”试点研究之前的状态。这项研究显示出“评估出院”流程在改善计划外护理中改善患者流量和改善医院绩效方面的显着优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号