首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >An Exploratory Study of Nurses’ Attitude towards Peer Review in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
【24h】

An Exploratory Study of Nurses’ Attitude towards Peer Review in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital

机译:卢尔德圣母医院护士对同行评议态度的探索性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim : The objective of this research is to explore the attitude of nurses’ at Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital towards peer review. It explores their understanding of the use of peer review as a tool for enhancing accountability, staff development and quality patient care in clinical settings. Background : The HSE has committed to fostering a culture of continuous learning and has also emphasised the need for timely feedback to be given to staff in the workplace to enhance their engagement and enable them perform to their upmost ability (HSE, 2015; HSE, 2016). The researcher is a clinical nurse manager 3 in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital with a pivotal role in assisting with the direction and supervision of nursing services to provide a high level of quality patient care. The hospital provides Acute General care, Orthopaedic service, Maternity, Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive care. This study was undertaken to explore how peer review, described in the study as the process used by nurses of the same grade to give constructive feedback on the quality of nursing care provided by their colleagues measured against agreed standards, could enhance quality care provision among professional nurses. Research Method : The research followed a concurrent mixed method approach using questionnaires and focus group. 820 questionnaires were distributed to all grades of nursing and midwifery staff. The returns generatedh 277 responses. The focus group was conducted with nurses who were exposed to a formal peer review practice for a period of one month. Quantitative data was analysed using a statistical package for social science (SPSS) and qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis and an electronic software package (MAXQDA). Results : The findings showed that nursing staff are in favour of the use of peer review in nursing practice. Nurses want peer review to be done in a professional manner following training on how to give feedback. Participants found that peer review helped them to be reflective on their work practices and how they contribute to the team’s performance. It helped them to know their strengths and weaknesses. The participants in the study felt that peer review should be compulsory and not be anonymous. Conclusion : Nursing staff see a need for peer review practice in the hospital. They feel that it could prove to be an invaluable tool that can to be used to engage and motivate nurses to be more productive and safety conscious in their practice. Ultimately, peer review will lead to better outcomes for staff and patients.
机译:目的:这项研究的目的是探讨卢尔德圣母医院护士对同行评审的态度。它探索了他们对使用同行评审作为在临床环境中加强问责制,员工发展和优质患者护理的工具的理解。背景:HSE致力于培养持续学习的文化,并强调必须及时向工作场所的员工提供反馈,以增强他们的敬业度并使其发挥最大的才能(HSE,2015; HSE,2016 )。研究人员是卢尔德圣母医院的临床护士经理3,在协助指导和监督护理服务以提供高质量的患者护理方面发挥着关键作用。该医院提供急性一般护理,骨科服务,产妇,儿科和新生儿重症监护。进行这项研究的目的是探讨同行评议(在研究中被描述为同级护士根据商定标准对同事提供的护理质量进行建设性反馈的过程)如何提高专业人士的优质护理质量护士。研究方法:研究采用问卷和焦点小组的并发混合方法。向所有级别的护理和助产人员分发了820份问卷。产生的回报为277响应。焦点小组由与一名正式的同伴复习实践接触了一个月的护士进行。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)分析定量数据,并使用主题分析和电子软件包(MAXQDA)分析定性数据。结果:调查结果表明,护理人员赞成在护理实践中使用同行评议。护士希望在接受有关如何提供反馈的培训之后,以专业的方式进行同行评审。参与者发现,同行评审有助于他们反思自己的工作实践以及他们对团队绩效的贡献。它帮助他们了解自己的优势和劣势。该研究的参与者认为,同行评审应该是强制性的,而不是匿名的。结论:护理人员认为需要在医院进行同行评审。他们认为这可能是一种宝贵的工具,可用于吸引和激励护士在实践中提高生产效率和安全意识。最终,同行评审将为员工和患者带来更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号