首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Care delivery pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in England and the Netherlands: a comparative study
【24h】

Care delivery pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in England and the Netherlands: a comparative study

机译:英格兰和荷兰的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的护理提供途径:一项比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction : A remarkable difference in care delivery pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the presence of hospital-at-home for COPD exacerbations in England and its absence in the Netherlands. The objective of this paper is to explain this difference. Methods : Descriptive COPD statistics and care delivery pathways on all care levels within the institutional context, followed by a comparison of care delivery pathways and an explanation of the difference with regard to hospital-at-home. Results: The Netherlands and England show broad similarities in their care delivery pathways for COPD patients. A major difference is the presence of hospital-at-home for COPD exacerbations in England and its absence in the Netherlands. Three possible explanations for this difference are presented: differences in the urgency for alternatives (higher urgency for alternative treatment models in England), the differences in funding (funding in England facilitated the development of hospital-at-home) and the differences in the substitution of tasks to nurses (substitution to nurses has taken place to a larger extent in England). Discussion and Conclusion: The difference between the Netherlands and England regarding hospital-at-home for COPD exacerbations can be explained in three ways. Hospital-at-home has proved to be a safe alternative for hospital care for selected patients, and should be considered as a treatment option for COPD exacerbations in the Netherlands.
机译:简介:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的护理提供途径中的显着差异是,英格兰在家中存在COPD急性发作的医院,而荷兰则没有。本文的目的是解释这种差异。方法:在机构范围内,对所有护理级别的描述性COPD统计数据和护理提供途径,然后比较护理提供途径并解释家中医院的区别。结果:荷兰和英格兰在COPD患者的护理提供途径上显示出广泛的相似性。一个主要的区别是英格兰存在COPD急性发作的家庭医院,而荷兰则没有。对于这种差异,提出了三种可能的解释:替代方案的紧迫性差异(英格兰的替代治疗模式的紧迫性较高),资金的差异(英格兰的资金促进了家庭医院的发展)以及替代方案的差异护士的任务分配(在英格兰,护士的替代工作在很大程度上已发生)。讨论与结论:荷兰和英国在COPD急性加重期间在家医院之间的差异可以用三种方式来解释。事实证明,在家中医院对于某些患者的医院护理是一种安全的替代选择,在荷兰,COPD加重应被视为一种治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号