首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >The chronic care model: congruency and predictors among patients with cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Netherlands
【24h】

The chronic care model: congruency and predictors among patients with cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Netherlands

机译:慢性护理模型:荷兰心血管疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的一致性和预测因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The Chronic Care Model (CCM) achieved widespread acceptance and reflects the core elements of patient-centred care in chronic diseases such as CVD and COPD. Our aim is to assess the extent to which current care for CVD and COPD patients aligns with the CCM in Dutch healthcare practices in the early stages of implementing disease-management programmes, thereby revealing possible predictors that tell us whether certain patients are more likely to receive CCM-compliant care than others. Methods We use a cross-sectional study, addressing CVD or COPD patients from 106 primary care practices in the Netherlands. Our response rate was 53%; i.e., 2,487 of 4,681 questionnaires were returned. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) was used to assess compliance with CCM. Quality of life was assessed with the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and we used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess depressive symptoms. Multilevel regression models were performed to reveal predictors of high CCM compliance. Results With a mean (SD) of 2.77 (0.86) in CVD patients and 2.89 (0.89) in COPD patients (p?=?0.002), the PACIC sum score was lower than in previous studies conducted in HMOs in the US, but similar to a European primary care setting study. The PACIC score was associated with age and depressive symptoms in both patient groups. Conclusions Younger and less depressed patients report higher PACIC scores, indicating that their care better aligns to the CCM.
机译:背景技术慢性护理模型(CCM)已得到广泛认可,并反映了以患者为中心的慢性病(如CVD和COPD)护理的核心要素。我们的目的是评估在实施疾病管理计划的早期阶段,目前针对CVD和COPD患者的护理在荷兰医疗保健实践中与CCM保持一致的程度,从而揭示可能的预测因素,告诉我们某些患者是否更有可能接受治疗符合CCM标准的护理要比其他人好。方法我们采用横断面研究方法,针对荷兰106个初级保健实践中的CVD或COPD患者进行研究。我们的回应率为53%;即,返回了4,681份问卷中的2,487份。慢性病护理患者评估(PACIC)用于评估对CCM的依从性。生活质量通过36型健康简短调查表(SF-36)进行评估,我们使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评估抑郁症状。进行了多级回归模型以揭示高CCM依从性的预测因素。结果CVD患者的平均(SD)为2.77(0.86),COPD患者的平均(SD)为2.89(0.89)(p?=?0.002),PACIC总分低于美国以前HMO开展的研究,但相似进行欧洲初级保健设置研究。两组患者的PACIC评分均与年龄和抑郁症状相关。结论年龄较小和抑郁程度较低的患者报告的PACIC评分较高,表明他们的护理更适合CCM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号