...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology >Comparative evaluation of nondestructive devices for measuring pavement thickness in the field
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of nondestructive devices for measuring pavement thickness in the field

机译:在现场测量路面厚度的非破坏性设备的比较评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Estimating pavement surface thicknesses without requiring large footprint equipment or pavement repairs is critical for the structural evaluation of airfield pavement. A research team from the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center conducted an evaluation of eleven nondestructive technologies, including eight ground penetrating radar (GPR) devices and three wave propagation technologies, on twenty-one hot-mix asphalt concrete (AC) and nineteen portland cement concrete (PCC) test locations with varying pavement thicknesses. The different technologies were used to estimate pavement thickness over predetermined test points. For each pavement structure, a core was extracted from one of the test points to provide calibration data of each testing device for data refinement. The accuracy of each technology was quantified by calculating the absolute difference between the actual core measurement and the estimated thickness measurement. The results from the devices tested led to the conclusion that separate devices are required on AC and PCC for optimal performance. The ultrasonic tomography and impact echo devices worked best on PCC surfaces, and the 1GHz horn antenna GPR devices performed best on AC surfaces. The side-by-side testing demonstrated the capabilities of the technologies on varying pavement structures without discrepancies that would likely occur when comparing one set of results to those from a different study.
机译:在不需要大型占地面积设备或路面维修的情况下估算路面表面厚度对于飞机场路面的结构评估至关重要。美国陆军工程师研究与发展中心的一个研究小组对二十一种热拌沥青混凝土(AC)和十九种波特兰进行了11种无损技术的评估,包括8种探地雷达(GPR)装置和3种波传播技术。路面厚度不同的水泥混凝土(PCC)测试位置。使用不同的技术来估算预定测试点上的路面厚度。对于每个路面结构,从其中一个测试点中提取芯,以提供每个测试设备的校准数据以进行数据优化。通过计算实际岩心测量值与估算厚度测量值之间的绝对差,可以量化每种技术的准确性。测试设备的结果得出这样的结论:为了获得最佳性能,AC和PCC上需要单独的设备。超声层析成像和冲击回波设备在PCC表面上效果最佳,而1GHz喇叭天线GPR设备在AC表面上效果最佳。并排测试证明了该技术在不同路面结构上的功能,而没有将一组结果与另一项研究的结果进行比较时可能出现的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号