...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of molecular medicine >Comparative study of the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow- and human adipose-derived stem cells under cyclic tensile stretch using quantitative analysis
【24h】

Comparative study of the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow- and human adipose-derived stem cells under cyclic tensile stretch using quantitative analysis

机译:定量分析法在循环拉伸作用下人骨髓和人脂肪干细胞成骨分化能力的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies comparing the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow-derived stem cells (hBMSCs) and human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium have been inconclusive. Apart from chemical stimuli, mechanical stimuli have also been shown to be important in bone tissue engineering, which is referred to as functional bone tissue engineering. hBMSCs and hASCs have been shown to be sensitive to both chemical and mechanical stimuli. In an attempt to find a better seed cell in functional bone tissue engineering, we tried to quantify the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs and hASCs under both mechanical and chemical stimuli. In this study, hBMSCs and hASCs were isolated from the same volunteers. Cells were cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium with and without exposure to cyclic tensile stretch (CTS). Quantitative measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity revealed that the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs was similar to that of hASCs in the early phase of differentiation in the CTS-stimulated groups. Quantitative measurement of mineralization showed that the late-phase osteogenic differentiation capacity of the hBMSCs was superior to that of hASCs in the CTS-stimulated groups. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed 5 and 10 days after cell culture. The results of the RT-PCR revealed that the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hASCs was inferior to that of hBMSCs both in the CTS-stimulated and unstimulated groups. All the results showed that both hBMSCs and hASCs were sensitive to CTS during the osteogenic differentiation process. This study compared the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs and hASCs in response to mechanical stimulations and has important implications for the use of stem cells in functional bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
机译:比较在成骨分化培养基中培养的人骨髓来源干细胞(hBMSCs)和人脂肪来源干细胞(hASCs)的成骨分化能力的研究尚无定论。除了化学刺激外,机械刺激在骨骼组织工程中也很重要,这被称为功能性骨骼组织工程。 hBMSC和hASC已显示对化学和机械刺激均敏感。为了在功能性骨组织工程中寻找更好的种子细胞,我们试图量化hBMSCs和hASCs在机械和化学刺激下的成骨分化能力。在这项研究中,hBMSC和hASC是从同一志愿者中分离出来的。在有或没有暴露于循环拉伸(CTS)的情况下,在成骨分化培养基中培养细胞。碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性的定量测量表明,在CTS刺激组中,hBMSC的成骨分化能力与hASC的成骨分化能力相似。矿化的定量测量表明,在CTS刺激组中,hBMSC的后期成骨分化能力优于hASC。细胞培养后5和10天进行逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)分析。 RT-PCR结果显示,在CTS刺激组和未刺激组中,hASC的成骨分化能力均低于hBMSC。所有结果表明,hBMSCs和hASCs在成骨分化过程中均对CTS敏感。这项研究比较了hBMSCs和hASCs对机械刺激的成骨分化能力,对于干细胞在功能性骨组织工程和再生医学中的应用具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号