...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Medical Sciences >Intrauterine Fetal and Neonatal Death between Small for Date and Non-Small for Date in Small for Gestational Age Infants
【24h】

Intrauterine Fetal and Neonatal Death between Small for Date and Non-Small for Date in Small for Gestational Age Infants

机译:小胎龄和非小胎龄的胎儿宫内胎儿和新生儿死亡

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To demonstrate the differences in intrauterine fetal deaths and neonatal deaths between small for date (SFD) and Non-SFD neonates by applying a novel classification from both Z scores of placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) to small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. Methods: From 93,034 placentas/infants of mothers who vaginally delivered a singleton infant (Japan Perinatal Registry Network database 2013), SGA (n=7,780) was chosen according to the reference to Japanese neonatal growth chart. They were divided into two subgroups: SFD (body weight and height less than the 10supth/sup percentile, n=3,379) and Non-SFD (only body weight less than the 10supth/sup percentile, n=4,401). Z scores of PW and F/P based on the standard curves for sex-, parity-, and gestational-age-specific PW and F/P were calculated. The population was classified into 9 groups according to the combination of 'low vs. middle vs. high' i) PW Z score and ii) F/P Z score. In both i) and ii), ± 1.28 standard deviations in the Z scores were used for classifying low vs. middle vs. high, with 3×3 making 9 groups. From top-left to bottom-right, we labeled the groups as Group A to Group I. Results: SFD and Non-SFD neonates distributed in the same 6 groups (A, D, E, G, H, I). In group E, which was considered to be balanced placental and infant growth, the incidence of intrauterine fetal death was significantly higher in Non-SFD neonates than in SFD neonates. In group D, which was considered to be small placenta and balanced infant growth, the incidence of neonatal death was significantly higher in SFD neonates than in Non-SFD neonates. Conclusion: Assessment of SGA neonates by dividing them into SFD and Non-SFD neonates and application of a 9-group classification by PW and F/P Z scores were informative to understand the pathophysiological involvement of an imbalance between placental and fetal sizes.
机译:目的:通过对胎盘重量(PW)和胎儿/胎盘重量比(Z / F)的Z值进行新的分类,以证明小日期(SFD)和非SFD新生儿的宫内胎儿死亡和新生儿死亡的差异。 ),以适合胎龄(SGA)新生儿。方法:从93,034名经阴道分娩单胎婴儿的母亲的胎盘/婴儿中(日本围产期注册网络数据库,2013年),根据对日本新生儿生长图的参考,选择了SGA(n = 7,780)。它们分为两个子组:SFD(体重和身高小于10 百分位数,n = 3,379)和Non-SFD(仅体重小于10 >百分位数,n = 4,401)。根据针对性别,胎次和胎龄的标准PW和F / P的标准曲线,计算了PW和F / P的Z分数。根据“低,中,高” i)PW Z分数和ii)F / P Z分数的组合,将人群分为9组。在i)和ii)中,Z得分的±1.28标准偏差用于对低,中,高进行分类,其中3×3分为9组。从左上到右下,我们将各组标记为A组至I组。结果:SFD和非SFD新生儿分布在相同的6个组(A,D,E,G,H,I)中。 E组被认为是胎盘和婴儿的平衡生长,非SFD新生儿的宫内胎儿死亡发生率明显高于SFD新生儿。 D组被认为是小胎盘和均衡的婴儿生长,SFD新生儿的新生儿死亡发生率明显高于非SFD新生儿。结论:通过将SGA新生儿分为SFD和非SFD新生儿进行评估,并通过PW和F / P Z评分进行9组分类,有助于了解胎盘和胎儿大小不平衡的病理生理影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号