首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial
【24h】

Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial

机译:扎博沙星与莫西沙星治疗COPD恶化的患者:一项多中心,双盲,双模拟,随机,对照,III期,非自卑性试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract: A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval,?–7.7%–8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference,?–0.2%; 95% confidence interval,?–9.0%–8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation.
机译:摘要:现已开发出一种新的喹诺酮唑泊沙星。因此,需要进行一项非劣效性试验,以将该新化合物与另一种广泛使用的喹诺酮类药物进行比较,以检查其治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重的疗效和安全性。这是一项前瞻性,多中心,双盲,双盲,随机,对照,平行组,III期,非劣效性的临床试验,旨在比较口服唑泊沙星(367 mg,每天一次,共5天)与莫西沙星(400 mg每天一次,连续7天),用于治疗COPD恶化的患者。共有345例中度COPD恶化的COPD患者通过31家大学医院的门诊进行了研究。每个方案的临床分析显示,扎泊沙星的临床治愈率为86.7%,莫西沙星的治愈率为86.3%(比率差异为0.4%; 95%的置信区间为–7.7%–8.6%)。意向治疗分析显示临床治愈率分别为77.1%和77.3%(差异,?-0.2%; 95%置信区间,?-9.0%-8.8%)。这些结果证实了扎泊沙星不次于莫西沙星。唑泊沙星的有利微生物应答率为67.4%,莫西沙星的有利微生物应答率为79.5%(P = 0.22)。沙博沙星组的患者表现出更好的以患者为导向的结果,这是通过莫西沙星组患者的慢性肺病工具患者报告的结局评估结局和COPD评估测试得分得出的。与扎波沙星有关的药物不良反应发生率9.7%,与莫西沙星有关的药物不良反应发生率9.6%(P = 0.97)。沙波沙星组因不良事件引起的辍学率为0%(0/175),莫西沙星组为1.8%(3/167)(P = 0.12)。对于COPD急性加重患者的治疗,口服唑泊沙星(367 mg,每天一次,连续5天)不逊于口服莫西沙星(400 mg,每天一次,连续7天)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号