首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hyperthermia: The official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group >Targetability of osteoid osteomas and bone metastases by MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)
【24h】

Targetability of osteoid osteomas and bone metastases by MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)

机译:MR引导的高强度聚焦超声(MRgHIFU)对类骨质骨瘤和骨转移瘤的靶向性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To retrospectively evaluate the suitability of MRgHIFU for osteoid osteomas (OOs) and bone metastases in patients who underwent minimally-invasive percutaneous thermal ablation. One hundred and sixty-seven lesions (115 metastases and 52 OOs) treated percutaneously between October 2014 and June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumors were located in the spine or sacrum (54), pelvis (43), limbs (50), ribs (17) and sternum (3). Tumor volume, matrix, anatomical environment and need for protection of surrounding structures or consolidation were assessed. Cases were classified into three categories: (a) lesions suitable for MRgHIFU therapy alone; (b) lesions suitable for MRgHIFU if protection of surrounding structures and/or bone consolidation is performed; (c) lesions not suitable for MRgHIFU. Twenty-six (50%) of OOs were classified as suitable for MRgHIFU alone and 17 (32.7%) as suitable for MRgHIFU with hydro-dissection. Matrix of treatable OOs was sclerotic (19), lytic (15) or mixed (9), with mean volume 0.56?cm3. Forty-one (35.7%) of metastases were classified as suitable for MRgHIFU alone and 43 (37.4%) as suitable with hydro-dissection and/or consolidation. Matrix of metastases was sclerotic (13), lytic (37) or mixed (34), with mean volume 71.9?cm3. Mean depth of targetable lesions was 50.9?±?28.4?mm. 97.7% of pelvic lesions and 94% of peripheral bone lesions were targetable by HIFU. 66.6% of spinal or sacral lesions were considered untreatable. MRgHIFU cannot be systematically performed non-invasively on bone tumors. Combination with minimally-invasive thermo-protective techniques may increase the number of eligible cases.
机译:为了回顾性评估MRgHIFU对接受微创经皮热消融术的类骨质骨瘤(OOs)和骨转移的适用性。回顾性分析2014年10月至2017年6月间经皮治疗的167个病变(115个转移灶和52个OOs)。肿瘤位于脊柱或骨(54),骨盆(43),四肢(50),肋骨(17)和胸骨(3)中。评估肿瘤体积,基质,解剖环境以及保护周围结构或巩固的必要性。病例分为三类:(a)仅适合MRgHIFU治疗的病变; (b)如果对周围结构和/或骨骼进行了保护,则适合MRgHIFU的病变; (c)不适合MRgHIFU的病变。二十六个(50%)的OOs被分类为仅适用于MRgHIFU,而17个(32.7%)的分类为适用于水解剖的MRgHIFU。可治疗的OOs的基质为硬化的(19),溶解的(15)或混合的(9),平均体积为0.56?cm3。有41(35.7%)转移被分类为仅适用于MRgHIFU,而有43(37.4%)被分类为适合进行水解剖和/或合并。转移的基质是硬化的(13),溶解的(37)或混合的(34),平均体积为71.9?cm3。可靶向病变的平均深度为50.9?±?28.4?mm。 HIFU可靶向97.7%的骨盆病变和94%的周围骨病变。 66.6%的脊柱或骨病变被认为不可治愈。 MRgHIFU不能系统地,无创地治疗骨肿瘤。与微创热保护技术结合使用可能会增加合格病例的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号