首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >A retrospective study to assess clinical characteristics and time to initiation of open-triple therapy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, newly established on long-acting mono- or combination therapy
【24h】

A retrospective study to assess clinical characteristics and time to initiation of open-triple therapy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, newly established on long-acting mono- or combination therapy

机译:一项回顾性研究,旨在评估长效单药或联合治疗新近建立的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床特征和开始三联疗法的时间

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: An incremental approach using open-triple therapy may improve outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is little sufficient, real-world evidence available identifying time to open-triple initiation. Methods: This retrospective study of patients with COPD, newly initiated on long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy or inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) combination therapy, assessed baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and exacerbations during 12 months prior to first LAMA or ICS/LABA use. Time to initiation of open-triple therapy was assessed for 12 months post-index date. Post hoc analyses were performed to assess the subsets of patients with pulmonary-function test (PFT) information and patients with and without comorbid asthma. Results: Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between cohorts in the prespecified and post hoc analyses. In total, 283 (19.3%) and 160 (10.9%) patients had moderate and severe exacerbations at baseline, respectively, in the LAMA cohort, compared with 482 (21.3%) and 289 (12.8%) patients in the ICS/LABA cohort. Significantly more patients initiated open-triple therapy in the LAMA cohort compared with the ICS/LABA cohort (226 [15.4%] versus 174 [7.7%]; P <0.001); results were similar in the post hoc analyses. Mean (standard deviation) time to open-triple therapy was 79.8 (89.0) days in the LAMA cohort and 122.9 (105.4) days in the ICS/LABA cohort ( P <0.001). This trend was also observed in the post hoc analyses, though the difference between cohorts was nonsignificant in the subset of patients with PFT information. Discussion: In this population, patients with COPD are more likely to initiate open-triple therapy following LAMA therapy, compared with ICS/LABA therapy. Further research is required to identify factors associated with the need for treatment augmentation among patients with COPD.
机译:简介:采用开放式三联疗法的增量疗法可能会改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的预后。但是,几乎没有足够的实际证据来确定打开三重引发的时间。方法:这项对COPD患者的回顾性研究,是新近采用长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)单一疗法或吸入皮质类固醇/长效β 2 -激动剂(ICS / LABA)联合治疗,评估基线首次使用LAMA或ICS / LABA之前的12个月内的人口统计学,临床特征和病情加重。在指标日期后的12个月内评估开始开放三联疗法的时间。进行事后分析,以评估具有肺功能检查(PFT)信息的患者以及有无合并性哮喘的患者的子集。结果:在既定分析和事后分析中,人群与临床特征相似。在LAMA队列中,共有283(19.3%)和160(10.9%)患者在基线时分别出现中度和重度加重,而ICS / LABA队列中分别为482(21.3%)和289(12.8%) 。与ICS / LABA队列相比,在LAMA队列中开始开放三联疗法的患者明显更多(226 [15.4%]对174 [7.7%]; P <0.001);事后分析结果相似。在LAMA研究组中,接受三联疗法的平均时间(标准差)为79.8(89.0)天,在ICS / LABA研究组中为122.9(105.4)天(P <0.001)。在事后分析中也观察到了这种趋势,尽管在具有PFT信息的患者子集中,队列之间的差异并不显着。讨论:在该人群中,与ICS / LABA治疗相比,COPD患者在LAMA治疗后更有可能开始开放三联疗法。需要进一步的研究来确定与COPD患者中需要加强治疗相关的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号