首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Healthcare Resource Utilization, Exacerbations, and Readmissions Among Medicare Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease After Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Therapy Initiation with Soft Mist versus Dry Powder Inhalers
【24h】

Healthcare Resource Utilization, Exacerbations, and Readmissions Among Medicare Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease After Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Therapy Initiation with Soft Mist versus Dry Powder Inhalers

机译:医疗保健资源利用率,慢性阻塞性肺病患者的慢性阻塞性肺病患者中的再服用,用软雾与干粉吸入器

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often managed with inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), yet real-world data on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) by inhaler type are lacking. This study compared HRU after LAMA initiation with a soft mist inhaler (SMI) versus a dry powder inhaler (DPI).Patients and Methods:Inclusion criteria were COPD diagnosis, age ≥40 years, LAMA initiation (index date = first LAMA SMI or DPI claim 9/1/14-6/30/18), and Medicare Advantage enrollment 1 year pre-index (baseline) to ≥30 days post-index (follow-up). Patients were followed to the earliest of discontinuation, switch, disenrollment, 1 year, or study end (7/31/18). Exclusion criteria were asthma, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer diagnoses, unavailable demographics, multiple index LAMAs, or baseline LAMA use. Cohorts (SMI or DPI) were balanced on baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Outcomes included per patient per month (PPPM) COPD-related HRU encounters, and exacerbations (defined as moderate [ambulatory visit with corticosteroid or antibiotic within ±7 days] or severe [emergency visit or inpatient admission]); and 30-day readmissions following COPD-related hospitalizations.Results:After weighting, cohorts (SMI [n=5360] and DPI [n=22,880]) were similar in age (72 and 73 years, respectively), gender (both 52% female), and COPD severity score (31.3 and 31.5, respectively). Cohorts had similar counts of follow-up HRU encounters. However, the SMI cohort had fewer (mean ± standard deviation) COPD-related exacerbations (0.054±0.082 vs DPI cohort 0.059±0.088 PPPM, p0.001) overall. Moreover, the SMI cohort had fewer severe exacerbations (0.030±0.058 vs DPI: 0.034±0.065 PPPM, p0.001). Hospitalizations among SMI patients had a lower adjusted odds of readmission versus hospitalizations among DPI patients (odds ratio: 0.656, 95% confidence interval= 0.460, 0.937; p=0.020).Conclusion:SMI initiators had significantly fewer COPD-related exacerbations than DPI initiators. In addition, lower odds of readmissions were observed following COPD-related hospitalizations among the SMI cohort, as compared with the DPI cohort.? 2020 Singer et al.
机译:背景:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)通常用吸入的长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMAS)进行管理,但缺乏吸入器类型对医疗资源利用(HRU)的现实世界数据。该研究与喇嘛发育后的软雾吸入器(SMI)与干粉吸入器(DPI)。患者和方法:纳入标准是COPD诊断,年龄≥40岁,喇嘛启动(指数日期=第一个喇嘛SMI或DPI索赔9 / 1/14-6 / 30/18),医疗保险优势注册1年前索引(基线)至≥30天后索引(随访)。患者遵循最早的停药,开关,脱颖而出,1年或学习结束(7/31/18)。排除标准是哮喘,囊性纤维化或肺癌诊断,不可用的人口统计,多名指数喇嘛或基线喇嘛使用。使用逆概率对基线特性进行额度概率,群组(SMI或DPI)在基线特征上进行平衡。每月患者(PPPM)患有COPD相关的HRU遇到的结果,以及加剧(定义为中度[±7天内的皮质类固醇或抗生素]或严重[紧急访问或住院入住]);与COPD相关的住院治疗后30天的阅约度。结果:在加权后,队列(SMI [n = 5360]和DPI [n = 22,880])在年龄(分别为72和73岁),性别(均为52%)女性),以及COPD严重程度评分(分别为31.3和31.5)。队列具有类似的后续HRU遭遇的数量。然而,SMI队列的较少(平均值±标准偏差)COPD相关的加剧(0.054±0.082 VS DPI坐标总体而言,P <0.001)。此外,SMI队列的严重恶化较少(0.030±0.058 Vs DPI:0.034±0.065 pppm,p <0.001)。 SMI患者的住院治疗患者的调整率较低,DPI患者之间的住院治疗率降低(差距:0.656,95%置信区间= 0.460,0.937; P = 0.020)。结论:SMI引发剂显着较少的COPD相关的恶化者比DPI引发剂。此外,与DPI队列相比,在SMI队列中的COPD相关住院治疗后,观察了再入院的少数几率。 2020 Singer等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号