首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety >Comparative analysis of a portable smartphonebased electrocardiograph (DHeart?) versus standard 6leads electrocardiograph in the canine patient.
【24h】

Comparative analysis of a portable smartphonebased electrocardiograph (DHeart?) versus standard 6leads electrocardiograph in the canine patient.

机译:犬类患者中基于便携式智能手机的心电图仪(DHeart?)与标准6导联心电图仪的对比分析。

获取原文
           

摘要

D-Heart? is a portable, smartphone-based device, which streams tracing via Bluetooth, enabling multiple leads electrocardiograms (ECGs) acquisition, currently used in human cardiology (Maurizi et al . 2017). The aim was to determine the accuracy of DHeart? compared with the gold standard nonportable 6lead electrocardiograph in the evaluation of cardiac rhythm in dogs. Standard 6lead and DHeart? ECGs were acquired in conscious dogs. Concordance between methods was assessed by weighted k Cohen index, with its relative significance, taking as end point variable standard 6lead ECG group. Bland Altman method (95% confidence level) was applied for P, PR, QRS, T and QT. Since differences didn’t follow a normal distribution, a nonparametric approach was used to determine limits of agreement. P was significant when < 0.05 (Maurizi et al . 2017). Amplitude of waves was not considered because currently the software doesn’t allow voltage variation. 115 dogs of different weights and breeds admitted to the Cardiology Service of DIMEVET were enrolled. Mean age was 7,5±4 years. Most were intact males (45%, n=51). The most represented breed was mongrel (27%, n=32). Weighted Cohen's kappa test demonstrated excellent concordance in the evaluation of the heart rhythm (0.989, p<0.001), for ST segment morphology (0.991, p<0,001) and for T wave morphology (0.838, p=0.040). There was a 100% concordance in P morphology determination. P, PR, QRS, T and QT intervals comparison with BlandAltman showed an extremely good concordance for DHeart? measurements (95% limit of agreement ±0.9 ms for P, ±10 ms for PR, ±35 ms for QRS, ±5 ms for T wave). Less concordance resulted for QT (±80 ms). In Conclusion, DHeart? proved effective accurate recording of ECG comparable to standard 6lead electrocardiographs, opening new perspectives to improve diagnostic tools in veterinary cardiology. Future perspective will be the development of a telecardiology network and to improve arrhythmia’s diagnosis in small animal practice (Bruining et al ., 2014; Haberman et al ., 2015).
机译:D-Heart?是一款基于智能手机的便携式设备,可通过蓝牙进行流式跟踪,从而实现多导联心电图(ECG)的采集,目前已在人类心脏病学中使用(Maurizi et al.2017)。目的是确定DHeart的准确性?与金标准非便携式6导心电图仪进行比较,以评估犬的心律。标准6lead和DHeart?心电图是在有意识的狗中获得的。方法之间的一致性通过加权k Cohen指数及其相对意义进行评估,将其作为终点变量标准6lead ECG组。对P,PR,QRS,T和QT采用Bland Altman方法(置信度为95%)。由于差异并非遵循正态分布,因此使用非参数方法来确定一致性限制。当<0.05时P显着(Maurizi等人2017)。由于当前该软件不允许电压波动,因此未考虑波动幅度。入组DIMEVET心脏病学服务中心的115头不同体重和品种的狗。平均年龄为7.5±4岁。大多数是完整的男性(45%,n = 51)。代表性最高的品种是杂种(27%,n = 32)。加权Cohen的kappa检验在心律评估(0.989,p <0.001),ST段形态(0.991,p <0.001)和T波形态(0.838,p = 0.040)方面显示出极好的一致性。 P形态测定具有100%的一致性。 P,PR,QRS,T和QT间隔与BlandAltman的比较显示了DHeart的极佳一致性。测量值的一致性(P的±95毫秒,PR的±10毫秒,QRS的±35毫秒,T波的±5毫秒)的95%一致极限。 QT的一致性较低(±80 ms)。最后,DHeart?与标准的6lead心电图仪相比,ECG被证明能有效准确地记录心电图,从而为改善兽医心脏病学的诊断工具开辟了新的前景。未来的前景将是发展心电图网络并改善小动物实践中的心律失常的诊断(Bruining等,2014; Haberman等,2015)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号