...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hyperthermia: The official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group >Comparison of microwave ablation and multipolar radiofrequency ablation, both using a pair of internally cooled interstitial applicators: Results in ex vivo porcine livers
【24h】

Comparison of microwave ablation and multipolar radiofrequency ablation, both using a pair of internally cooled interstitial applicators: Results in ex vivo porcine livers

机译:使用一对内部冷却的间隙涂药器比较微波消融和多极射频消融:离体猪肝脏的结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) and multipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in ex vivo porcine livers, in both cases using a pair of internally cooled interstitial applicators. Materials and methods: MWA was performed on ex vivo porcine livers (n?=?60) using a pair of simultaneously powered, internally cooled shaft interstitial antennae. Four power settings were used: 50?W, 60?W, 70?W and 80?W (n?=?15 per setting). Multipolar RFA was also performed on ex vivo porcine livers (n?=?30), also using a pair of simultaneously powered, internally cooled shaft interstitial bipolar applicators. This was performed for two applicator types T30 (3?cm length) and T40 (4?cm length) at a manufacturer prescribed power of 60?W and 80?W, respectively (n?=?15 per applicator). Spacing between the two probes was 2?cm in all cases. Each power setting was applied for 15 ablations for 10?min each. The long-axis diameter (Dl), short-axis diameter (Ds) and the ratio Ds/Dl for each ablation were measured. Temperature data were recorded at 10 positions. Temperature curves were recorded at 3 locations, as well as the time required for the temperature to rise to 50°C. Results: Dl and Ds for all the power settings of MWA were significantly larger than that of both kinds of multipolar RFA (P??0.05). The rates of temperature to rise to 50°C in all the MW ablations power settings were significantly faster than those in both multipolar RF ablations. Conclusion: MWA by the simultaneous application of double antennae may be more advantageous for treating larger liver tumour than multipolar RFA.
机译:目的:为了比较微波消融(MWA)和多极射频消融(RFA)在离体猪肝脏中的有效性,在两种情况下均使用一对内部冷却的间隙涂抹器。材料和方法:MWA用一对同时供电,内部冷却的轴间质触角在离体猪肝脏(n≥60)上进行。使用了四个功率设置:50?W,60?W,70?W和80?W(每个设置n?=?15)。还使用一对同时供电的,内部冷却的干细胞间质性双极涂药器对离体猪肝脏(n≥30)进行了多极RFA。这是针对两种型号的T30(长度为3?cm长)和T40(长度为4?cm)T40施加的,制造商规定的功率分别为60?W和80?W(每个施加器n≥15)。在所有情况下,两个探针之间的间距为2?cm。每种功率设置均施加15次消融,每次10?min。测量每种消融的长轴直径(D1),短轴直径(Ds)和比率Ds / D1。在10个位置记录温度数据。记录了3个位置的温度曲线,以及温度升高到50°C所需的时间。结果:MWA的所有功率设置的D1和Ds均显着大于两种多极RFA的功率(P <0.05)。在所有兆瓦烧蚀功率设置中,温度上升至50°C的速度明显快于两种多极射频烧蚀中的温度。结论:同时应用双触角的MWA比多极RFA更有利于治疗较大的肝肿瘤。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号