...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Activity Profile Differences Between Sub-Elite Futsal Teams
【24h】

Activity Profile Differences Between Sub-Elite Futsal Teams

机译:亚精英五人制足球团队之间的活动资料差异

获取原文

摘要

Whilst there are a range of studies examining the differences in match demands between levels of competition, there is an absence of the analysis these differences between teams within the same level of competition. The study used notational analysis to identify performance indicators that differentiated between sub-elite futsal teams from Brazil, Spain and Australia during regular season matches. Based on world rankings, Spanish and Brazilian futsal was deemed to be superior to Australian futsal. The Australian players spent a significantly greater time engaged in high intensity activity than the Spanish players (sprinting: 0.36% v. 0.06%, p<0.05); running: 5.89% v. 3.33%). The Brazilian team displayed the greatest possession of the ball (40.0 ± 10.4%) when compared to the Spanish (23.5 ± 2.73%) and Australian teams (30.9 ± 2.54%) (p<0.01). Additionally, the Brazilian and Spanish teams made a greater number of successful passes per minute of match-play than the Australian team (10.7 ± 1.06 v. 8.68 ± 0.81 v. 5.31 ± 0.60, respectively, p<0.01). These results generally suggest that lower high intensity activity output and superior ball possession and passing accuracy appear to be critical determinants in discriminating between successful and unsuccessful match performance. Accordingly, training to improve technical and decision making skills, specifically related to maintaining ball possession and improving passing accuracy, will likely assist lower performing teams.
机译:尽管有大量研究检查了不同比赛水平之间的比赛要求差异,但缺乏分析同一比赛水平之间团队之间这些差异的方法。这项研究使用符号分析来确定绩效指标,这些绩效指标在常规赛中区分了来自巴西,西班牙和澳大利亚的五人制足球五人制足球队。根据世界排名,西班牙和巴西的五人制足球被认为是优于澳大利亚的五人制足球。与西班牙球员相比,澳大利亚球员花更多的时间从事高强度运动(冲刺:0.36%对0.06%,p <0.05);运行:5.89%对3.33%)。与西班牙队(23.5±2.73%)和澳大利亚队(30.9±2.54%)相比,巴西队的控球率最高(40.0±10.4%)(p <0.01)。此外,巴西和西班牙队每分钟的比赛成功传球次数比澳大利亚队多(分别为10.7±1.06对8.68±0.81对5.31±0.60,p <0.01)。这些结果通常表明,较低的高强度活动输出以及较高的控球率和传球准确性似乎是区分成功和不成功比赛表现的关键决定因素。因此,为提高技术和决策技巧而进行的培训,特别是与保持控球权和提高传球准确性有关的培训,可能会帮助表现不佳的球队。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号