...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of endocrinology >Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
【24h】

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

机译:连续血糖监测系统对新诊断的2型糖尿病患者中Lispro和Aspart疗效和安全性的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin intensive therapy. Methods. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) above 9% was hospitalized and randomly divided into two groups group Asp (NovoRapid group) and group Lis (Prandilin group). They all received CSII and metformin therapy. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. C-peptide and insulin and fructosamine were determined. CGMS was continuously applied for 4 days after reaching the glycemic target. Results. There were no significant differences in daily dosages of insulin, fasting plasma C-P and 2 h postprandial C-P and insulin, and fructosamine at the baseline and endpoint between the groups Asp and Lis. No significant differences were seen in the 24 h mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of the MBG (SDBG), fasting blood glucose, number of glycemic excursion (NGE), and the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUC) of glucose above 10.0 mmol/L or the decremental area over the curve (AOC) of glucose below 3.9 mmol/L between the two groups. Conclusions. Lispro and aspart had the similar ability to control the glycemic variations in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-IPR-17010338.
机译:目的。通过连续葡萄糖监测系统(CGMS)比较新诊断的2型糖尿病(T2DM)接受连续皮下胰岛素治疗的患者中速效胰岛素类似物(RAIAs)天冬氨酸(NovoRapid)和赖脯胰岛素(Prandilin)对血糖变化的影响输注(CSII)和二甲双胍强化治疗。方法。这是一项单盲随机对照试验。总共110例新诊断为T2DM且血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c%)高于9%的患者入院,并随机分为Asp组(NovoRapid组)和Lis组(普兰地林组)。他们都接受了CSII和二甲双胍治疗。达到血糖目标后,将治疗维持2-3周。测定了C肽以及胰岛素和果糖胺。达到血糖目标后,连续4天连续应用CGMS。结果。 Asp组和Lis组在基线和终点时,胰岛素,空腹血浆C-P和餐后C-P和2 h胰岛素,果糖胺的日剂量无显着差异。在24小时的平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE),24小时的平均血糖(MBG),MBG的标准差(SDBG),空腹血糖,血糖波动的数量(NGE)和两组之间的低血糖发生率。同样,两组之间在高于10.0 mmol / L的葡萄糖曲线下面积(AUC)或低于3.9 mmol / L的葡萄糖曲线下面积(AOC)均未发现显着差异。结论。 Lispro和aspart在新诊断的T2DM患者中具有类似的控制血糖变化的能力。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为ChiCTR-IPR-17010338。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号