首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Comparison between intravenous dexmedetomidine and local lignocaine infiltration to attenuate the haemodynamic response to skull pin head holder application during craniotomy
【24h】

Comparison between intravenous dexmedetomidine and local lignocaine infiltration to attenuate the haemodynamic response to skull pin head holder application during craniotomy

机译:静脉右美托咪定和局部利诺卡因浸润在开颅手术中减弱对颅骨钉头固定器应用的血流动力学反应的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aims: Skull pin application is intensely painful and can be accompanied by detrimental haemodynamic changes. We compared intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine with local infiltration of lignocaine at pin application sites to attenuate haemodynamic changes associated with pin application. Methods: Fifty-two patients undergoing craniotomy were randomised to either group dexmedetomidine (received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min starting at induction of anaesthesia) or group lignocaine (received 3 ml of 2% lignocaine infiltration at pin application sites before pin application). Anaesthetic protocol was standardised. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at the following time intervals, pre-induction baseline, pre-infiltration, post-infiltration, pre-pin application and post-pin application at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 and 15 min. Statistical analysis was done using independent samples t-test, Fisher exact test and Chi-square test. Results: HR and MAP were comparable between the groups at all the study intervals. The incidence of adverse haemodynamic effects attributable to pin application (tachycardia and/or hypertension) was comparable between the groups (2 patients in group dexmedetomidine and 5 in group lignocaine). However, the incidence of hypotension and/or bradycardia was significantly greater in the dexmedetomidine group (19 patients in group dexmedetomidine and 5 patients in group lignocaine; P = 0.0007). Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg over 10 min is comparable to local infiltration of 2% lignocaine at pin application sites to attenuate the haemodynamic response associated with skull pin application. However, use of dexmedetomidine is associated with significantly higher incidence of hypotension and bradycardia.
机译:背景和目的:颅骨钉的应用非常痛苦,并可能伴随有害的血液动力学变化。我们比较了静脉注射(IV)右美托咪定与木质素在针应用部位的局部浸润,以减弱与针应用相关的血液动力学变化。方法:将52例行开颅手术的患者随机分为右美托咪定组(在麻醉诱导后10分钟内接受1μg/ kg右美托咪定)或利诺卡因组(在应用针前在应用针处接受3 ml 2%木质素浸润)。 。麻醉方案已标准化。在以下时间间隔记录心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP),分别在1,2,3,4时记录诱导前基线,渗透前,渗透后,钉前和钉后,5、10和15分钟。使用独立样本的t检验,Fisher精确检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。结果:在所有研究时间间隔内,两组之间的HR和MAP相当。各组之间因使用针(心动过速和/或高血压)引起的不良血流动力学影响的发生率相当(右美托咪定组2例,利多卡因组5例)。然而,右美托咪定组低血压和/或心动过缓的发生率明显更高(右美托咪定组19例,利多卡因组5例; P = 0.0007)。结论:在10分钟内静脉注射右美托咪定1 mcg / kg相当于在钉子施用部位局部浸润2%利多卡因,以减弱与头钉施用有关的血液动力学反应。但是,右美托咪定的使用与低血压和心动过缓的发生率显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号