首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-targetedagent combination therapy in advanced pancreaticcancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-targetedagent combination therapy in advanced pancreaticcancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:吉西他滨靶向药物联合治疗在晚期胰腺癌中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: A meta-analysis was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of gemcitabinein combination with targeted agents versus gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Methods:PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched to find relevant clinical trials which were designedto investigate targeted agents in the treatment of APC patients (up to October 2017). The end-points includedoverall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity rate. Publicationbias was evaluated by Egger’s test and funnel plots. Results: Twenty-eight trials involving a total of 8858 volunteerswere selected for the meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in OS (HR = 0.969, 95% CI: 0.922-1.019,P = 0.217) and ORR (OR = 1.053, 95% CI: 0.799-1.388, P = 0.714) between targeted agents plus gemcitabine andgemcitabine alone. Targeted agents plus gemcitabine had significant but marginal benefit in PFS (HR = 0.923, 95%CI: 0.876-0.974, P = 0.003) compared with gemcitabine alone. Targeted agents added to gemcitabine significantlyincreased the grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhoea and rash compared with gemcitabine alone. Thefunnel plot presented substantial symmetry and showed little evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Based onthe outcomes of this analysis, addition of targeted agents to gemcitabine did not improve the OS and ORR of APCpatients, and significantly but marginally increased their PFS. So the clinical efficacies of targeted agents need tobe further investigated using other treatment strategies.
机译:目的:进行荟萃分析,比较吉西他滨联合靶向药物与吉西他滨单独治疗晚期胰腺癌(APC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:检索PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane Library数据库以找到相关的临床试验,这些试验旨在调查治疗APC患者的靶向药物(截至2017年10月)。终点包括总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR)和毒性率。通过Egger的检验和漏斗图评估了Publicationbias。结果:选择了涉及8858名志愿者的28个试验进行荟萃分析。仅靶向药物加吉西他滨和吉西他滨的OS(HR = 0.969,95%CI:0.922-1.019,P = 0.217)和ORR(OR = 1.053,95%CI:0.799-1.388,P = 0.714)没有发现显着差异。 。与单独使用吉西他滨相比,靶向药物加吉西他滨在PFS方面具有显着但微不足道的优势(HR = 0.923,95%CI:0.876-0.974,P = 0.003)。与单独使用吉西他滨相比,加入吉西他滨的靶向药物显着增加了3-4级中性粒细胞减少,血小板减少,腹泻和皮疹。漏斗图显示出基本的对称性,几乎没有证据表明出版物有偏见。结论:基于该分析的结果,吉西他滨添加靶向药物并不能改善APC患者的OS和ORR,但显着提高了其PFS。因此,靶向药物的临床疗效需要使用其他治疗策略进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号