...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Efficacy and safety of dual combination therapy of blood pressure-lowering drugs as initial treatment for hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of dual combination therapy of blood pressure-lowering drugs as initial treatment for hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:双重组合治疗血压降低药物作为高血压初始治疗的功效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of dual combination of blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs as initial treatment for hypertension. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL were searched until August 2017 for randomized, double-blind trials of dual combination therapy vs. monotherapy in adults with hypertension who were either treatment naive or untreated for at least 4 weeks. Regimens were classified with reference to usual daily 'standard-dose'; for example, Results: Thirty-three trials (13 095 participants) with mean baseline mean BP 155/100 mmHg were included. Compared with standard-dose monotherapy, dual combinations of <1 + <1, 1 + <1 and 1 + 1 (i.e. low-to-standard dose), showed a dose-response relationship in reducing SBP [mean differences (95% confidence interval) of 2.8 (1.6-4.0), 4.6 (3.4-5.7) and 7.5 (5.4-9.5) mmHg, respectively], and in improving BP control [risk ratio (RR) (95% confidence interval) 1.11 (0.92-1.34), 1.25 (1.16-1.35) and 1.42 (1.27-1.58), respectively]. Withdrawals due to adverse events were uncommon with low-to-standard dose dual combinations, with no significant difference compared with standard-dose monotherapy [2.9 vs. 2.2%; RR 1.28 (0.85 to 1.92)]. There were fewer data for higher dose dual combinations, which did not appear to produce substantial additional efficacy and could potentially be less tolerable. Conclusion: Compared with standard-dose monotherapy, initiating treatment with low-to-standard dose dual combination therapy is more efficacious without increasing withdrawals due to adverse events. PROSPERO registration: CRD42016032822.
机译:目的:评估双重组合(BP) - 漏药作为高血压初始治疗的疗效和耐受性。方法:搜查了Medline,Embase,Central,直到2017年8月,用于双组合疗法的随机,双盲试验与单药治疗的高血压患者治疗幼稚或未治疗至少4周。方案参考通常的日常“标准剂量”分类。例如,结果:包含平均基线的三十三项试验(13 095名参与者),平均值BP 155/100mmHg。与标准剂量单疗法相比,<1 + 1,1 + 1和1 + 1(即低对标准剂量)的双重组合显示了减少SBP的剂量 - 反应关系[平均差异(95%的信心间隔)2.8(1.6-4.0),4.6(3.4-5.7)和7.5(5.4-9.5)mmHg,提高BP控制[风险比(RR)(95%置信区间)1.11(0.92-1.34 ),1.25(1.16-1.35)和1.42(1.27-1.58)]。由于不良事件的提取较少,具有低标准剂量的剂量双组合,与标准剂量单疗法相比没有显着差异[2.9对2.2%; RR 1.28(0.85至1.92)]。较高剂量的双重组合数据较少,这似乎没有产生大量的额外功效,并且可能潜在的额外效果不太容许。结论:与标准剂量单疗法相比,用低标准剂量双组合治疗的启动治疗更有效,而不会因不良事件而增加。 Prospero注册:CRD42016032822。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号