首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Comparison of the accuracy of transpulmonary thermodilution measurement using indicators of different temperatures
【24h】

Comparison of the accuracy of transpulmonary thermodilution measurement using indicators of different temperatures

机译:使用不同温度的指标比较经肺热稀释法测量的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Transpulmonary thermodilution measurement is a convenient method for hemodynamic monitoring. However, the previously reported indicator temperature was not consistent. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) monitoring using indicators of different temperatures. A total of 104 critically ill patients received PiCCO monitoring using indicators of either 0°C or 8°C. The PiCCO measurements, including general ejection fraction, global end-diastolic index, and cardiac index, were compared between the two temperatures, and were also correlated with that of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The two indicator temperatures differed significantly in hemodynamic measurements (emP/em<0.01). PiCCO measurements with either indicator temperatures showed positive correlation with TEE results (emP/em<0.05). The 0°C indicator had universally higher correlation coefficients than the 8°C indicator. So, PiCCO monitoring with the 0°C indicator might have better accuracy than the 8°C indicator.
机译:经肺热稀​​释测量是一种方便的血液动力学监测方法。但是,先前报告的指示剂温度不一致。这项研究旨在比较使用不同温度指标的脉搏指数连续心输出量(PiCCO)监测的准确性。共有104名危重患者接受了使用0-1C或8CXC指标的PiCCO监测。在两个温度之间比较PiCCO测量值,包括总射血分数,总舒张末期指数和心脏指数,并且还与经食道超声心动图(TEE)的相关性。在血液动力学测量中,两个指示剂温度存在显着差异( P < 0.01)。用任一指示剂温度进行的PiCCO测量均与TEE结果呈正相关( P < 0.05)。 0#x000b0; C指标的相关系数普遍高于8° C指标。因此,使用0° C指示器进行的PiCCO监视可能比使用8° C指示器具有更好的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号