...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology >Comparison of neuroendocrine differentiation and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutation status in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
【24h】

Comparison of neuroendocrine differentiation and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutation status in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer

机译:原发性和转移性结直肠癌的神经内分泌分化和KRAS / NRAS / BRAF / PIK3CA / TP53突变状态的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor tissue has been recognized as an important prerequisite for new targeted therapies. To evaluate the suitability of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue for these treatment approaches and to find a possible link to pretherapeutic conditions of other targeted strategies, we compared neuroendocrine differentiation and emKRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53/em mutational status in primary and metastatic CRC. Immunohistochemical expression analysis of neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin was performed on archival CRC tissue, comprising 116 primary tumors, 258 lymph node metastases and 72 distant metastases from 115 patients. All CRC samples but 30 distant metastases were subjected to mutation analysis of emKRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA/em, and emTP53/em. Neuroendocrine marker expression was found significantly less frequently in lymph node metastases compared to primary tumors and distant metastases (20%, 31%, 28%, respectively, emP/em = 0.044). emKRAS/em mutation rates increased significantly from primary tumors to lymph node metastases and distant metastases within the neuroendocrine negative CRC group (44%, 53%, 64%, respectively, emP/em = 0.042). Neuroendocrine differentiation was significantly less concordant than emKRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53/em mutational status in primary tumor/lymph node metastases pairs (65% versus 88%-99%; emP/em < 0.0001) and primary tumor/distant metastases pairs (64% versus 83%-100%; emP/em = 0.027 and emP/em < 0.0001, respectively). According to these data, therapeutic targeting of neuroendocrine tumor cells can be considered only for a subset of CRC patients and biopsies from the metastatic site should be used to guide therapy. A possible importance of lacking neuroendocrine differentiation for progression of emKRAS/em mutant CRC should be further investigated.
机译:肿瘤组织的神经内分泌分化已被认为是新的靶向治疗的重要前提。为了评估结直肠癌(CRC)组织对于这些治疗方法的适用性,并找到与其他靶向策略的治疗前条件的可能联系,我们比较了神经内分泌分化和 KRAS / NRAS / BRAF / PIK3CA / TP53 原发性和转移性CRC中的突变状态。在档案CRC组织上进行了神经内分泌标志物嗜铬粒蛋白A和突触素的免疫组织化学表达分析,包括115例患者的116例原发肿瘤,258例淋巴结转移和72例远处转移。除30个远处转移灶外,所有CRC样本均进行了 KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,PIK3CA TP53 的突变分析。与原发性肿瘤和远处转移相比,在淋巴结转移中发现神经内分泌标记物的频率显着降低(分别为 P = 0.044)(分别为20%,31%,28%)。在神经内分泌阴性CRC组中,从原发肿瘤到淋巴结转移和远处转移, KRAS 突变率显着增加(分别为44%,53%,64%, P = 0.042) )。在原发性肿瘤/淋巴结转移对中,神经内分泌分化的一致性远不及 KRAS / NRAS / BRAF / PIK3CA / TP53 突变状态(65%对88%-99%; P < 0.0001)和原发肿瘤/远处转移对(分别为64%和83%-100%; P = 0.027和 P < 0.0001 )。根据这些数据,仅对一部分CRC患者可以考虑对神经内分泌肿瘤细胞进行治疗靶向,并且应使用来自转移部位的活检来指导治疗。缺乏神经内分泌分化对于 KRAS 突变CRC进展的可能重要性应进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号