...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Medicine >Prediction of Pretest Probability Scoring Systems in Pulmonary Embolism: Wells, Kline and Geneva
【24h】

Prediction of Pretest Probability Scoring Systems in Pulmonary Embolism: Wells, Kline and Geneva

机译:肺栓塞的预测试概率评分系统的预测:Wells,Kline和Geneva

获取原文

摘要

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a clinical entity with high mortality rate and therefore rapid diagnosis is necessary. For this purpose many diagnostic strategies have been developed for avoiding or necessitating further investigations. The hallmark of these strategies is assessing the pretest clinic probability of PE. In this study, the effectiveness of Wells, Geneva and Kline methods were investigated in a university hospital emergency department. 74 patients were enrolled in this study. The inter-group differences in scoring systems were significant for Wells and Kline but non-significant for Geneva method. The diagnosis of PE was correlated with Wells and Kline system but Geneva system lacked it. The Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses was performed for comparing the pretest clinical probability scoring systems and the greatest area under the curve was found in Wells system. Wells method seems more useful compared to Geneva and Kline methods particularly in emergency department.
机译:肺栓塞(PE)是具有高死亡率的临床实体,因此需要快速诊断。为此目的,已经开发了许多诊断策略来避免或需要进一步的研究。这些策略的标志是评估PE的临床前检测可能性。在这项研究中,在大学医院急诊科中研究了Wells,Geneva和Kline方法的有效性。这项研究招募了74名患者。韦尔斯和克莱恩(Wells and Kline)的评分系统的组间差异显着,而日内瓦法则不显着。 PE的诊断与Wells和Kline系统有关,但Geneva系统缺乏。进行接收者操作特征分析以比较预测试的临床概率评分系统,并在Wells系统中找到曲线下的最大面积。与日内瓦和克莱恩方法相比,韦尔斯方法似乎更有用,尤其是在急诊室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号