首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Effectiveness of butorphanol as an adjuvant to lidocaine for haematoma or periosteal block: A prospective, randomised, double blind study
【24h】

Effectiveness of butorphanol as an adjuvant to lidocaine for haematoma or periosteal block: A prospective, randomised, double blind study

机译:布托啡诺作为利多卡因辅助治疗血肿或骨膜阻塞的有效性:一项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background:The peripheral nerve endings carrying pain contains opiod receptors. Blocking these receptors during haematoma block or periosteal block may provide better analgesia.Aim:Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of butorphanol as an adjuvant to lidocaine for haematoma block.Settings and Design:This is a two centre, prospective, individually randomised, two group, parallel, double-blind clinical trial.Methods:In this study, 115 American society of anaesthesiologist grade I and II adult patients scheduled for closed reduction of fractures were randomly allocated into two groups; Group A received 1% lidocaine (2 mg/kg) where as Group B received 1% lidocaine (2 mg/kg) with butorphanol (0.02 mg/kg) during haematoma block. Pain was assessed before, during and after manipulation of fracture by using visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). Onset time of block, time for first rescue analgesic, 24 hour analgesic requirement and sedation levels were noted.Statistical Analysis:Data analysed with the unpaired t-test with Welch correction assuming unequal variances and Fisher's exact test using Graph pad Prism 5.02 version.Results:Onset time of haematoma block was significantly less in the butorphanol group compared to the lidocaine group (P=0.0003). The mean time for first rescue analgesic was significantly higher and total analgesic requirement was significantly lower in the butorphanol group (P<0.0001). Mean VAS scores were lower and sedation scores were higher in the butorphanol group.Conclusions:Addition of butorphanol to lidocaine quickens onset of haematoma block, provides excellent post manipulation analgesia and decreases 24 hour total analgesic requirement without excessive sedation.
机译:背景:携带疼痛的周围神经末梢含有阿片受体。在血肿阻滞或骨膜阻滞期间阻滞这些受体可能会提供更好的镇痛作用。目的:评估丁吗啡醇作为利多卡因辅助血肿阻滞的有效性和安全性设置和设计:这是两个中心的,前瞻性的,单独随机分组的两组,方法:在这项研究中,将115名计划行闭合复位骨折的美国麻醉医师协会I级和II级成年患者随机分为两组。 A组在血肿阻塞期间接受1%的利多卡因(2 mg / kg),而B组接受1%的利多卡因(2 mg / kg)和丁烷酚(0.02 mg / kg)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS 0-10)评估骨折前,骨折中和骨折后的疼痛。统计分析:假设方差不相等,采用Welch校正的不配对t检验分析数据,并使用Graph pad Prism 5.02版本的Fisher精确检验分析数据,记录阻塞发生时间,首次抢救镇痛时间,24小时镇痛要求和镇静水平。 :与利多卡因组相比,布托啡诺组血肿阻滞的发作时间显着减少(P = 0.0003)。布托啡诺组首次急诊镇痛的平均时间明显更长,总镇痛需求明显更低(P <0.0001)。结论:丁烷酚组的VAS平均评分较低,镇静评分较高。结论:利多卡因中加入丁啡尼诺可加快血肿阻滞的发作,提供良好的术后镇痛效果,并减少24小时总镇痛需要量,而无过度镇静作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号