首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Market mechanisms for financing the reduction of emissions from deforestation and degradation in developing countries (REDD) – learning from payments for ecosystem services schemes
【24h】

Market mechanisms for financing the reduction of emissions from deforestation and degradation in developing countries (REDD) – learning from payments for ecosystem services schemes

机译:为发展中国家减少毁林和退化造成的排放筹集资金的市场机制(REDD)–从生态系统服务计划付款中学习

获取原文
       

摘要

At its 16th session in Cancun, the Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change decided on a framework for implementing the reduction of deforestation and degradation (REDD). This global compensation mechanism for the ecosystem services, such as carbon storage and sequestration by forests in the developing countries, however, left critical details untouched regarding future REDD negotiations. Among others, the question of how to design a proper financing mechanism for the final phase of REDD implementation remains. This article reviews theoretical approaches on payments for ecosystem service schemes and provides recommendations for future negotiations on funding REDD mechanisms. Of special interest is the classification of forest ecosystem services according to physical and economic characteristics, rivalry and excludability, scale and directional flow. These characteristics help to determine which kind of funding mechanism should be set up at the global scale. Carbon storage and carbon sequestration are classified as common-pool services, which are most efficiently provided through a market mechanism. However, market mechanisms for small sets of forest ecosystem services can lead to trade-offs, having negative effects on the provision of particularly biodiversity-dependent services. Potential trade-offs are identified and a strongly regulated market mechanism bundling global scale ecosystem services is recommended.
机译:联合国气候变化框架公约缔约方大会在坎昆举行的第十六届会议上,决定了实施减少毁林和退化的框架。但是,这种针对生态系统服务的全球补偿机制,例如发展中国家的森林的碳储存和封存,在未来的REDD谈判中并未触及关键细节。除其他外,如何为REDD实施的最后阶段设计适当的融资机制的问题仍然存在。本文回顾了有关生态系统服务计划付款的理论方法,并为未来有关REDD机制融资的谈判提供了建议。特别令人感兴趣的是根据自然和经济特征,竞争和排他性,规模和方向流对森林生态系统服务进行分类。这些特征有助于确定应在全球范围内建立哪种筹资机制。碳存储和碳固存被归类为公共池服务,通过市场机制最有效地提供碳池和碳固存。但是,少量森林生态系统服务的市场机制可能导致权衡,对提供特别是依赖生物多样性的服务产生负面影响。确定潜在的取舍,并建议将全球规模的生态系统服务捆绑在一起的监管严格的市场机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号