...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biomedical Research >Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome-Clinical diagnosis versus limited channel diagnostic nocturnal polysomnography
【24h】

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome-Clinical diagnosis versus limited channel diagnostic nocturnal polysomnography

机译:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症-临床诊断与有限通道诊断性夜间多导睡眠图

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of detailed history, clinical examination and Mullers manoeuvre compared to limited channel diagnostic nocturnal polysomnography in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. To detect criteria, that will help to clinically identify and assess the severity of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.Materials and methods: This is a prospective comparative study of 40 patients who attended outpatient department of ENT with snoring, in the age group of 30 to 60 years. All patients underwent detailed history, clinical examination, and Mullers manoeuvre using flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy followed by sleep study.Results: 3 patients wereclinically graded as no OSAS, out of which 2 patients (67%) had no OSAS by sleep study result. 3 patients clinically graded as mild, all had mild OSAS (100%). 6 patients who were graded as moderate, 2 (33%) had mild, 3(50%) had moderate and 1 (17%) had severe OSAS by sleep study results. 28 patients were clinically labelled as severe OSAS, of which 7 (25%) had mild, 5 (18%) had moderate and 16 (57%) had severe OSAS by sleep study results.Conclusion: The grading of OSAS was possible in 60% (24/40) of patients compared with sleep study results although the presence or absence of OSA could be detected in 97.5 % (39/40) of patients using our grading criteria.
机译:目的:评估详细病史,临床检查和穆勒(Mullers)动作与有限通道诊断性夜间多导睡眠图相比较在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征诊断中的疗效。为了检测标准,这将有助于临床识别和评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的严重程度。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性比较研究,研究对象是40例年龄在30至60岁之间的ENT门诊就诊的患者。年份。所有患者均接受了详细的病史,临床检查,并使用了柔性鼻咽喉镜进行了Mullers手术,随后进行了睡眠研究。结果:3例患者被临床评估为无OSAS,其中2例(67%)没有睡眠研究。临床分级为轻度的3例患者均具有轻度的OSAS(100%)。根据睡眠研究结果,中度分级为6例,轻度分级为2(33%),中度分级为3(50%),重度OSAS为1(17%)。根据睡眠研究结果,临床上将28例患者标记为严重OSAS,其中7例(25%)为轻度OSAS,5例(18%)为中度,16例(57%)为严重OSAS。结论:60例患者可能进行OSAS分级%(24/40)的患者与睡眠研究结果相比,尽管使用我们的评分标准可以发现97.5%(39/40)的患者存在OSA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号