首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity >The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods
【24h】

The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods

机译:体育活动资源评估(PARA)工具:评估城市社区体育活动资源的特征,便利性和不文明程度

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Neighborhood environment factors may influence physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to develop and test a brief instrument to systematically document and describe the type, features, amenities, quality and incivilities of a variety of PA resources. Method The one-page Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument was developed to assess all publicly available PA resources in thirteen urban lower income, high ethnic minority concentration neighborhoods that surrounded public housing developments (HDs) and four higher income, low ethnic minority concentration comparison neighborhoods. Neighborhoods had similar population density and connectivity. Trained field coders rated 97 PA resources (including parks, churches, schools, sports facilities, fitness centers, community centers, and trails) on location, type, cost, features, amenities, quality and incivilities. Assessments typically took about 10 minutes to complete. Results HD neighborhoods had a mean of 4.9 PA resources (n = 73) with considerable variability in the type of resources available for each neighborhood. Comparison neighborhoods had a mean of 6 resources (n = 24). Most resources were accessible at no cost (82%). Resources in both types of neighborhoods typically had about 2 to 3 PA features and amenities, and the quality was usually mediocre to good in both types of neighborhoods. Incivilities at PA resources in HD neighborhoods were significantly more common than in comparison neighborhoods. Conclusion Although PA resources were similar in number, features and amenities, the overall appearance of the resources in HD neighborhoods was much worse as indicated by substantially worse incivilities ratings in HD neighborhoods. The more comprehensive assessment, including features, amenities and incivilities, provided by the PARA may be important to distinguish between PA resources in lower and higher deprivation areas.
机译:背景邻里环境因素可能会影响体育锻炼(PA)。这项研究的目的是开发和测试一个简短的工具,以系统地记录和描述各种PA资源的类型,特征,便利设施,质量和不文明之处。方法开发了一页的体育活动资源评估(PARA)仪器,以评估13个城市低收入,高少数民族集中度社区(围绕公共住房开发(HDs))和四个高收入,低少数民族集中度社区的所有公共可用PA资源比较街区。社区人口密度和连通性相似。受过训练的现场编码人员对97种PA资源(包括公园,教堂,学校,体育设施,健身中心,社区中心和小径)的位置,类型,成本,功能,便利设施,质量和礼节进行了评分。评估通常需要大约10分钟才能完成。结果HD邻域的平均PA资源为4.9(n = 73),每个邻域的可用资源类型差异很大。比较邻域的平均资源为6(n = 24)。大多数资源都是免费获得的(82%)。两种类型的社区中的资源通常都具有大约2至3个PA功能和便利设施,并且两种类型的社区的质量通常都中等至中等。在高清晰度社区,公共广播资源的不文明比在比较社区中更为普遍。结论尽管巴勒斯坦权力机构的资源在数量,功能和便利性上都相似,但在高密度社区中资源的整体外观要差得多,这在高密度社区中的公民等级明显较差。 PARA提供的更全面的评估,包括功能,便利性和不文明性,对于区分低贫困地区和高贫困地区的PA资源可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号