首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Introduction of structured oral examination in formative assessment of pharmacology for 2nd professional MBBS students
【24h】

Introduction of structured oral examination in formative assessment of pharmacology for 2nd professional MBBS students

机译:为第二届MBBS专业学生在药理学形成性评估中引入结构化口腔检查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Conventional Oral Examination (COE) is criticized for being too subjective and being influenced by academic and non-academic factors. Another pitfall of COE is unequal distribution of time. Different examiners use a different set of questions with varying difficulty levels. Student related factors include gender, accent, vocabulary used and ability to pick nonverbal cues. These factors make COE less reliable and valid assessment tool. To overcome the limitations of this useful tool, SOE can be implement instead of COE. Methods: It is a prospective and non-randomized study comprising 79 students of pharmacology appeared for two forms of viva i.e. COE and SOE. Three sets of questionnaires - Must know, should know and nice to know were prepared, each having 15 items with increasing difficulty levels and were validated by subject experts and pretested. Ten minutes were allotted for each student for each form of viva. Feedback of students about the novel method was obtained by using semi-structured questionnaire comprising of 19 closed ended questions and one open-ended question. Results: Structured oral examination (SOE) yielded significantly higher marks as compared to COE. There were significant inter-examiner variations in marks awarded in SOE and COE. Other factors influencing implementation were difficulty in structuring viva, rigid time limits, lack of flexibility in knowledge content, monotony and fatigue. The students perceived this format not different from COE but felt that it required in depth preparation of topic. Conclusions: Conducting SOE is a resource-intensive exercise. Despite structuring, inter-examiner variability was not completely eliminated. The student’s performance was depended on factors related to examiners such as teaching experience, vernacular language used, and lack of training. Orientation and training of examiners in assessment strategies is necessary. Standardization of questionnaire is necessary before the implementation of SOE for summative assessment.
机译:背景:常规口试(COE)因过于主观且受到学术和非学术因素的影响而受到批评。 COE的另一个陷阱是时间分配不均。不同的考官使用不同的问题集,难度级别各不相同。与学生相关的因素包括性别,口音,使用的词汇以及选择非语言提示的能力。这些因素使COE的可靠性和有效性降低了。为了克服此有用工具的局限性,可以实施SOE而不是COE。方法:这是一项前瞻性且非随机的研究,由79名药理学学生出现,涉及两种形式的活体即COE和SOE。准备了三套问卷-必须知道,应该知道和很高兴知道,每套都有15项难度越来越高的项目,并经过主题专家的验证和预先测试。每个学生为每种形式的配音分配了十分钟。通过使用由19个封闭式问题和一个开放式问题组成的半结构化问卷,获得了学生对新方法的反馈。结果:与COE相比,结构化口腔检查(SOE)产生的评分明显更高。在SOE和COE中授予的审查员之间存在显着的差异。其他影响实施的因素包括:组织结构困难,时间限制严格,知识内容缺乏灵活性,单调和疲劳。学生们认为这种格式与COE没什么不同,但认为它是深度准备主题所必需的。结论:进行国有企业经营是一项资源密集的工作。尽管结构合理,检查者间的差异并未完全消除。学生的表现取决于与考官有关的因素,例如教学经验,所用的母语和缺乏培训。必须对考官进行评估策略方面的培训。在实施国有企业进行总结性评估之前,必须对问卷进行标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号