...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >A concurrent parallel study to compare the efficacy and safety of oral iron chelators, defrasirox and defriprone in patients of beta thalassaemia major
【24h】

A concurrent parallel study to compare the efficacy and safety of oral iron chelators, defrasirox and defriprone in patients of beta thalassaemia major

机译:一项并行的并行研究,比较口服铁螯合剂,地弗罗司和去复酮在重度β地中海贫血患者中的疗效和安全性

获取原文

摘要

Background: This study was planned to evaluate all the cases of β thalassaemia major, already receiving one of the oral iron chelators for a comparison among the efficacy, safety and economy of deferasirox and deferiprone to establish the better option in an Indian scenario. Methods: We identified two groups of patients: 38 treated with deferasirox and 35 treated with deferiprone. Laboratory parameters such as serum ferritin, creatinine, SGPT, Hb, CBC and urine were recorded at the time of inclusion and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the inclusion. The primary outcome variable was serum Ferritin level at the start and at the end of study. Serum ferritin level was carried out by microparticle enzyme linked immunoassay. Results: Before the study, the mean hemoglobin level was 7.32±1.50mg/dL ranged from 4 to 10.8 in deferasirox group and 7.54±1.15mg/dL ranged from 5.5 to 8.8 in deferiprone group. At the time of inclusion, study population was characterized by a mean serum ferritin value of 4735.11±450.01 SE in deferasirox and 4315.97±340.75 SE in deferiprone group. After one month the mean serum ferritin increases to 4578.66±371.96 in deferasirox and 4388.82±316.16 in deferiprone group. After three month the mean serum ferritin reduces to 4295.60±377.37 in deferasirox and 3988.88±349.84 in Deferiprone group. Conclusions: Thus, we conclude that deferasirox and deferiprone are well tolerated, have few adverse effects and almost have a comparable effect in lowering of the patient's serum ferritin level. Deferiprone is more cost effective but needs a strict control on compliance owing to requirement in three divided doses per day.
机译:背景:本研究计划评估所有已经接受过口服铁螯合剂治疗的重型β地中海贫血病例,以比较地拉罗司和去铁酮的疗效,安全性和经济性,从而在印度建立更好的选择。方法:我们确定了两组患者:38例用地拉罗司治疗,35例用去铁酮治疗。在入选时以及入选后1、3和6个月记录实验室参数,例如血清铁蛋白,肌酐,SGPT,Hb,CBC和尿液。主要结果变量是研究开始和结束时的血清铁蛋白水平。血清铁蛋白水平通过微粒酶联免疫法测定。结果:在研究之前,地拉罗司组的平均血红蛋白水平为7.32±1.50mg / dL,范围为4至10.8,而去铁酮组为7.54±1.15mg / dL,范围为5.5至8.8。纳入时,研究人群的特征是地拉罗司的血清铁蛋白平均值为4731.51±450.01 SE,去铁酮组的血清铁蛋白平均值为4315.97±340.75 SE。一个月后,地拉罗司的平均血清铁蛋白增至4578.66±371.96,去铁酮组的平均血清铁蛋白增至4388.82±316.16。三个月后,地拉罗司的平均血清铁蛋白降低至4295.60±377.37,而去铁酮组的血清铁蛋白降至3988.88±349.84。结论:因此,我们得出结论,地拉罗司和去铁酮耐受性良好,几乎没有不良反应,并且在降低患者血清铁蛋白水平方面几乎具有可比的作用。 Deferiprone更具成本效益,但由于每天需要三剂,因此需要严格控制依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号