首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of African and Asian Studies >Comparing the Status and Recognition of the Right to Development Under the RTD Declaration, African Charter on Human and People’s Right and Ethiopian Constitution
【24h】

Comparing the Status and Recognition of the Right to Development Under the RTD Declaration, African Charter on Human and People’s Right and Ethiopian Constitution

机译:比较《 RTD宣言》,《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》和埃塞俄比亚宪法下发展权的地位和承认

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite different controversies accompanied to it, the right to development is recognized in different international, regional and national laws. Therefore, the basic theme of this research with a view to evaluate the United Nation Declaration on the Right to Development(UNDRD), the African Charter on Human and People Right(ACHPR) and the Ethiopian constitution(FDRE constitution) comparatively. The parameters for comparing the recognition of the right to development under these legal documents are basically the definition, content, and the right holders and duty bearers of this specific right . After assessing these legal documents, the paper concludes that though these documents have some similarities concerning the definition of development, the definition given by the FDRE constitution is broader, the definition given by ACHPR and UNDRD. Regarding the right holders, while UNDRD put individuals, people and states as beneficiaries, ACHPR put only peoples as the beneficiaries of the right to development. The FDRE constitution is different from the two instruments as it put the beneficiaries are nations, nationalities and peoples of Ethiopia. In terms of the duty bearers of the right to development three of these legal documents have similar stand in that they all put the state as the prime duty bearer.
机译:尽管伴随着各种争议,但发展权在不同的国际,地区和国家法律中得到承认。因此,本研究的基本主题旨在比较地评估《联合国发展权宣言》(UNDRD),《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》(ACHPR)和埃塞俄比亚宪法(FDRE宪法)。比较这些法律文件对发展权的承认的参数基本上是该特定权利的定义,内容以及权利持有人和责任承担人。在评估了这些法律文件之后,论文得出的结论是,尽管这些文件在发展定义上有一些相似之处,但FDRE宪法给出的定义更广泛,ACHPR和UNDRD给出的定义则更为广泛。关于权利持有人,尽管开发署将个人,人民和国家作为受益人,但ACHPR仅将人民作为发展权的受益人。 FDRE宪法与这两项文书不同,因为它使受益人是埃塞俄比亚的民族,民族和人民。就发展权的义务承担者而言,这些法律文件中的三个具有相似的立场,因为它们都将国家视为主要的义务承担者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号