...
首页> 外文期刊>International archives of medicine >View of physicians on and barriers to patient enrollment in a multicenter clinical trial: experience in a Japanese rural area
【24h】

View of physicians on and barriers to patient enrollment in a multicenter clinical trial: experience in a Japanese rural area

机译:多中心临床试验中医师对患者入组的看法及其障碍:在日本农村地区的经验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundClinical trials in the general practice setting are important for providing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of different agents under various conditions. In conducting these trials, the participation of physicians and patient recruitment are important issues. Various investigations in the literature have reported views and attitudes of physicians on various types of clinical trials. Nevertheless, there is still little information concerning physicians participating in a clinical trial and among them, those who could not recruit any patients (unsuccessful physician recruiters).MethodsIn 2003, we collaborated in a large-scale multicenter study of Japanese hypertensive patients (COPE Trial). In Tokushima University Hospital and 18 other medical institutions, we investigated the views and attitudes of unsuccessful physician recruiters in comparison with successful physician recruiters, using a questionnaire.ResultsThe questionnaire was provided by mail to 47 physicians and 27 (57%) responded. The response rate was 79% for successful physician recruiters compared to 43% (P = 0.014) for unsuccessful physician recruiters. More successful physician recruiters (73%) than unsuccessful physician recruiters (42%) stated they had participated and enrolled patients in previous multicenter clinical trials. A significantly higher number of successful physician recruiters than unsuccessful physician recruiters (42%; P = 0.040) considered the presence of a support system with clinical research coordinators (CRC) as the reason for participation (80%). A large number of unsuccessful physician recruiters experienced difficulty in obtaining informed consent (67%), whereas a significantly smaller number of successful physician recruiters experienced such difficulty (20%; P = 0.014). The difficulties experienced by unsuccessful physician recruiters in the trial were as follows: inability to find possible participants (100%), difficulty in obtaining informed consent (58%), cumbersome procedures (58%), difficulty in long-term follow up (33%), and insufficient tools for explanation and obtaining informed consent (8%).ConclusionThis survey showed that successful physician recruiters consider a support system with CRC of value, and that they are skillful in obtaining informed consent. These views and attitudes may have originated from past experience involving clinical trials. In this regard, we need to develop an infrastructure to enlighten physicians on this support system for the promotion of clinical trials.
机译:背景技术在常规实践中的临床试验对于提供各种条件下不同药物的有效性和安全性的证据很重要。在进行这些试验时,医生的参与和患者招募是重要的问题。文献中的各种研究报告了医师对各种类型的临床试验的看法和态度。然而,关于参与临床试验的医生的信息仍然很少,其中包括那些不能招募任何患者的医生(不成功的医生招募者)。方法2003年,我们合作开展了一项针对日本高血压患者的大规模多中心研究(COPE试验) )。在德岛大学医院和其他18家医疗机构中,我们通过问卷调查了不成功的医生招聘者与成功的医生招聘者的看法和态度。结果该问卷通过邮件发送给47位医生,有27位(57%)答复。成功的医生招聘者的回应率为79%,而失败的医生招聘者的回应率为43%(P = 0.014)。成功的医师招募者(73%)比不成功的医师招募者(42%)表示,他们参加了先前的多中心临床试验并招募了患者。成功的医师招募人数比不成功的医师招募人数(42%; P = 0.040)高得多,他们认为存在具有临床研究协调员(CRC)的支持系统是参与的原因(80%)。大量不成功的医师招聘人员遇到了获得知情同意的困难(67%),而成功的医师招聘人员中遇到这种困难的比例却很小(20%; P = 0.014)。不成功的医师招聘者在试验中遇到的困难如下:无法找到可能的参与者(100%),难以获得知情同意(58%),繁琐的程序(58%),长期随访困难(33) %),并且没有足够的工具来解释和获得知情同意(8%)。结论这项调查表明,成功的医师招聘者考虑了具有CRC价值的支持系统,并且他们熟练掌握了知情同意。这些观点和态度可能源自过去涉及临床试验的经验。在这方面,我们需要开发基础设施,以启发医生使用此支持系统来促进临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号