首页> 外文期刊>International journal for equity in health >Viewing the Kenyan health system through an equity lens: implications for universal coverage
【24h】

Viewing the Kenyan health system through an equity lens: implications for universal coverage

机译:从公平角度看肯尼亚卫生系统:对全民覆盖的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Equity and universal coverage currently dominate policy debates worldwide. Health financing approaches are central to universal coverage. The way funds are collected, pooled, and used to purchase or provide services should be carefully considered to ensure that population needs are addressed under a universal health system. The aim of this paper is to assess the extent to which the Kenyan health financing system meets the key requirements for universal coverage, including income and risk cross-subsidisation. Recommendations on how to address existing equity challenges and progress towards universal coverage are made. Methods An extensive review of published and gray literature was conducted to identify the sources of health care funds in Kenya. Documents were mainly sourced from the Ministry of Medical Services and the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. Country level documents were the main sources of data. In cases where data were not available at the country level, they were sought from the World Health Organisation website. Each financing mechanism was analysed in respect to key functions namely, revenue generation, pooling and purchasing. Results The Kenyan health sector relies heavily on out-of-pocket payments. Government funds are mainly allocated through historical incremental approach. The sector is largely underfunded and health care contributions are regressive (i.e. the poor contribute a larger proportion of their income to health care than the rich). Health financing in Kenya is fragmented and there is very limited risk and income cross-subsidisation. The country has made little progress towards achieving international benchmarks including the Abuja target of allocating 15% of government's budget to the health sector. Conclusions The Kenyan health system is highly inequitable and policies aimed at promoting equity and addressing the needs of the poor and vulnerable have not been successful. Some progress has been made towards addressing equity challenges, but universal coverage will not be achieved unless the country adopts a systemic approach to health financing reforms. Such an approach should be informed by the wider health system goals of equity and efficiency.
机译:引言目前,公平和全民覆盖主导着世界范围内的政策辩论。卫生筹资方法对于普遍覆盖至关重要。应该仔细考虑资金的收集,汇集,购买或提供服务的方式,以确保在全民医疗体系下满足人口需求。本文的目的是评估肯尼亚卫生筹资体系在多大程度上满足了全民覆盖的关键要求,包括收入和风险交叉补贴。提出了有关如何应对现有平等挑战以及在实现全民覆盖方面取得进展的建议。方法对发表的文献和灰色文献进行了广泛的审查,以确定肯尼亚的卫生保健资金来源。文件主要来自医疗服务部和公共卫生与卫生部。国家一级的文件是主要的数据来源。如果没有国家一级的数据,可从世界卫生组织的网站上查询。分析了每种筹资机制的关键功能,即创收,汇集和购买。结果肯尼亚卫生部门严重依赖现金支付。政府资金主要通过历史增量法分配。该部门的资金严重不足,并且医疗保健缴费是递减的(即穷人在医疗保健中的收入所占比例比富人大)。肯尼亚的卫生筹资分散,风险和收入的交叉补贴非常有限。该国在实现国际基准方面进展甚微,其中包括阿布贾(Abuja)将政府预算的15%分配给卫生部门的目标。结论肯尼亚的卫生系统高度不平等,旨在促进公平和满足穷人和弱势群体需求的政策并未取得成功。在应对公平挑战方面已经取得了一些进展,但是除非该国对卫生筹资改革采取系统性方法,否则无法实现全民覆盖。这种方法应以更广泛的公平和效率卫生系统目标为依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号