...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive Care Medicine Experimental >Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
【24h】

Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway

机译:人工气道受试者机械“吹气-吹气”的安全性和耐受性的初步经验

获取原文

摘要

Abstract BackgroundCatheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance.MethodsWe applied insufflation of 50?cmH2O for 3?s and exsufflation of ??45 cmH2O for 4?s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60?min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death.ResultsMechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6?±?20?years and mean Apache II score 23.3?±?7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6?±?649.9?ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated.ConclusionsOur preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations.Trial registrationEudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register).
机译:摘要背景:在导管插入的受试者中,导管的呼吸道抽吸作用仅限于近端气道,并伴有粘膜创伤性损伤和耐受性差。 “机械吹气-吹气”会施加正压,然后突然下降至负压。该方法对气管内插管或气管切开插管患者应用50?cmH2O吹气3?s,对?45 cmH2O吹气4?s的方法是潜在的优势。需要吸痰。如果在近端人工气道中抽吸并可见分泌物,则执行10到12次吹气-吹气的循环,并重复进行。在手术前,手术后5分钟和60分钟收集临床和实验室参数。结果:在ICU停留期间一直跟踪受试者直至出院或死亡。结果对需要抽吸的7名男性和6名女性受试者进行了26次机械吹气-吹气。平均年龄为62.6?±?20?岁,平均Apache II得分为23.3?±?7.4分。在每个疗程中,在插管中位数11.5(IQR 6.25; 25.75)进行2个中位数(IQR 1; 2)周期。平均吹入潮气量为1043.6?±?649.9?ml。在基线时间和手术后时间点之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。未发现气压伤,去饱和,肺不张,咯血或其他气道并发症和血液动力学并发症。除一例外,所有机械通气-通气治疗均有效,表现出近端人工气道分泌物,且耐受性良好。结论我们的初步数据表明,机械通气-通气治疗对于人工气道患者可能是安全有效的。安全性和有效性需要在针对不同患者人群的大型研究中得到证实。试验注册EudraCT 2017-005201-13(欧盟临床试验注册)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号