首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Medicine Research >A systematic review and meta-analysis of a Chinese herbal remedy, Qili Qiangxin, as an adjuvant therapy to patients with heart failure
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis of a Chinese herbal remedy, Qili Qiangxin, as an adjuvant therapy to patients with heart failure

机译:对中药七里强心作为心力衰竭患者辅助治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Methods: We searched six electronic databases until June2014 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Qili Qiangxinfor patients with heart failure. After independent identificationof included trials and data extraction, we performed dataanalysis and quality assessment of the included trials usingReview Manager 5.2 and GRADEpro software. We conductedthe review based on our registered protocol [PROSPERO registration:CRD42013006106].Results: A total of 121 RCTs (123 publications) publishedbetween 2005 and 2014 were included, involving 10,731 heartfailure patients aged from 18 to 98 years old. The methodologicalquality of majority of included trials was poor.Meta-analysis showed no significant difference between QiliQiangxin plus conventional treatment and conventional treatmentalone for mortality (RR 0.48, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.14; n=483patients). However, Qili Qiangxin plus conventional treatmentreduced the major cardiovascular events (RR 0.47, 95%CI 0.31to 0.70; n=168 patients) and re-hospitalization due to heartfailure (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.70; n=465 patients) comparedwith conventional treatment alone. Qili Qiangxin improvedNYHA levels (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.30 to 1.50; n=4147 patients) andquality of life (MD -8.48 scores, 95% CI -9.56 to -7.39; n=792patients) measured by Minnesota Living with Heart FailureQuestionnaire (lower scores better). There were no seriousadverse events reported to Qili Qiangxin.Conclusion: Qili Qiangxin appears to be beneficial in reducingcardiovascular events, re-hospitalization and quality oflife in patients with heart failure. It appears to be safe. Thisfinding was based on low quality of clinical trials and mustbe interpreted with caution. Further large, rigorous trials arewarranted to confirm the benefit.
机译:方法:直到2014年6月,我们在六个电子数据库中搜索了七力强新对心力衰竭患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。在独立鉴定纳入试验和数据提取后,我们使用Review Manager 5.2和GRADEpro软件对纳入试验进行了数据分析和质量评估。结果:我们纳入了2005年至2014年之间发布的121篇RCT(123篇出版物),涉及10,731名18至98岁的心衰患者。多数纳入试验的方法学质量均较差。荟萃分析显示,七里强心联合常规治疗与常规治疗之间的死亡率无显着差异(RR 0.48,95%CI 0.20至1.14; n = 483名患者)。然而,七里强心联合常规治疗可减少主要的心血管事件(RR 0.47,95%CI 0.31至0.70; n = 168患者)和因心衰而再次住院(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.37至0.70; n = 465患者)。与仅常规治疗相比。明尼苏达州心力衰竭患者问卷调查(Qin Qiang Xinxin)改善了NYHA水平(RR 1.40,95%CI 1.30至1.50; n = 4147患者)和生活质量(MD -8.48评分,95%CI -9.56至-7.39患者; n = 792患者)分数越低越好)。没有关于七里强新的严重不良事件的报道。结论:七里强新似乎对减少心力衰竭患者的心血管事件,重新住院和改善生活质量有益。看来是安全的。该发现基于低质量的临床试验,必须谨慎解释。必须进行进一步的严格试验,以证实其益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号