首页> 外文期刊>Insights into Imaging >Changing trends in a decade of vascular radiology—the impact of technical developments of non-invasive techniques on vascular imaging
【24h】

Changing trends in a decade of vascular radiology—the impact of technical developments of non-invasive techniques on vascular imaging

机译:十年来血管放射学的变化趋势-非侵入性技术的技术发展对血管成像的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives This review aims to establish the impact on conventional angiography and endovascular intervention of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CE-CTA) on a background of evolving technology, changing clinical requirements and resulting clinical repercussions. Methods The angiographic and interventional caseload was prospectively recorded between 1997 and 2010, along with the CE-MRA and CE-CTA caseload. Waiting times and the marginal cost analyses for 2001 and 2009 were also prospectively established. Results Conventional diagnostic angiographies declined from a peak of 847 to 121 per year while endovascular interventions continue in similar numbers. CE-MRA increased from effectively none initially to 620 per year while CE-CTA has currently risen to 396 per year. Total diagnostic study numbers have increased but at reduced cost. Various influences are clear, including on-site modality availability, capability and accuracy along with impact of new therapies, research studies and adverse events. Conclusions Vascular imaging has undergone a metamorphosis in little over a decade because of CE-MRA and CE-CTA. With waiting times significantly reduced since the start of the study and the cost-effectiveness of both CE-MRA and CE-CTA as primary diagnostic investigations established, further development of these services is inevitable. Main Messages ? The availability of CE-MRA and CE-CTA has reduced the need for conventional angiography. ? Both waiting times and the marginal cost analyses for CE-MRA and CE-CTA have reduced. ? The impact of new therapies, research studies (e.g. ASTRAL) and adverse events is illustrated.
机译:目的这篇综述旨在确定在技术发展,临床要求不断变化和结果不断变化的背景下,对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)和对比增强计算机断层血管造影(CE-CTA)对常规血管造影和血管内干预的影响。临床影响。方法前瞻性地记录1997年至2010年间的血管造影和介入病例,以及CE-MRA和CE-CTA病例。还建立了2001年和2009年的等待时间和边际成本分析。结果传统的诊断性血管造影术从每年的峰值847下降到每年121,而血管内干预的数量仍在继续。 CE-MRA从最初的没有有效增加到每年620,而CE-CTA目前已经增加到每年396。诊断研究的总数有所增加,但成本降低了。各种影响是显而易见的,包括现场模式的可用性,功能和准确性,以及新疗法,研究和不良事件的影响。结论由于CE-MRA和CE-CTA,血管成像经历了近十年的变态。自研究开始以来,等待时间已大大减少,并且CE-MRA和CE-CTA的成本效益已确立为主要诊断研究,因此不可避免地进一步发展这些服务。主要讯息? CE-MRA和CE-CTA的可用性减少了对常规血管造影术的需求。 ? CE-MRA和CE-CTA的等待时间和边际成本分析都减少了。 ?说明了新疗法,研究(例如ASTRAL)和不良事件的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号