首页> 外文期刊>Influenza and other respiratory viruses. >Evaluation of twenty‐two rapid antigen detection tests in the diagnosis of Equine Influenza caused by viruses of H3N8 subtype
【24h】

Evaluation of twenty‐two rapid antigen detection tests in the diagnosis of Equine Influenza caused by viruses of H3N8 subtype

机译:评估22种快速抗原检测方法对H3N8亚型病毒引起的马流感的诊断

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious disease caused by viruses of the H3N8 subtype. The rapid diagnosis of EI is essential to reduce the disease spread. Many rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests for diagnosing human influenza are available, but their ability to diagnose EI has not been systematically evaluated. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 22 RAD tests in the diagnosis of EI. Methods The 22 RAD tests were performed on fivefold serial dilutions of EI virus to determine their detection limits. The four most sensitive RAD tests (ImmunoAce Flu, BD Flu examan, Quick chaser Flu A, B and ESPLINE Influenza A&B-N) were further evaluated using nasopharyngeal samples collected from experimentally infected and naturally infected horses. The results were compared to those obtained using molecular tests. Results The detection limits of the 22 RAD tests varied hugely. Even the four RAD tests showing the best sensitivity were 125-fold less sensitive than the molecular techniques. The duration of virus detection in the experimentally infected horses was shorter using the RAD tests than using the molecular techniques. The RAD tests detected between 27% and 73% of real-time RT-PCR-positive samples from naturally infected horses. Conclusions The study demonstrated the importance of choosing the right RAD tests as only three of 22 were fit for diagnosing EI. It was also indicated that even RAD tests with the highest sensitivity serve only as an adjunct to molecular tests because of the potential for false-negative results.
机译:背景技术马流感(EI)是由H3N8亚型病毒引起的高度传染性疾病。 EI的快速诊断对于减少疾病的传播至关重要。有许多用于诊断人类流感的快速抗原检测(RAD)检测方法,但尚未系统评估其诊断EI的能力。目的本研究的目的是比较22种RAD测试在EI诊断中的性能。方法对EI病毒的5倍系列稀释液进行22次RAD检测,以确定其检出限。使用从实验感染和自然感染的马中收集的鼻咽样品,进一步评估了四种最敏感的RAD测试(ImmunoAce流感,BD流感检查,Quick Chaser流感A,B和ESPLINE流感A&B-N)。将结果与使用分子测试获得的结果进行比较。结果22种RAD检测的检出限差异很大。即使是四个显示出最佳灵敏度的RAD测试,其灵敏度也比分子技术低125倍。使用RAD测试,在实验感染的马匹中检测病毒的持续时间比使用分子技术要短。 RAD检测从自然感染的马匹中检测出27%至73%的实时RT-PCR阳性样品。结论该研究表明选择正确的RAD测试的重要性,因为22种中只有3种适合诊断EI。还表明即使是灵敏度最高的RAD检测也只能作为分子检测的辅助手段,因为它可能会产生假阴性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号