首页> 外文期刊>Innovation in aging. >From a Bird’s Eye View: Whole Social Networks in Adult Day Care Centers and Continuing Care Retirement Communities
【24h】

From a Bird’s Eye View: Whole Social Networks in Adult Day Care Centers and Continuing Care Retirement Communities

机译:鸟瞰:成人日托中心和继续护理退休社区中的整个社交网络

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and Objectives The present study describes whole social networks in 4 adult day care centers (ADCCs) and 4 continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) in Israel. Method Each respondent received a list of names of all individuals receiving services in the respective ADCC or CCRC and was asked to indicate whom he/she knows from the list. We derived whole social network properties and used hierarchical cluster analysis to group network settings. We further examined the ability of the social network data to classify respondents as members of either an ADCC or a CCRC. Results Many social network properties were more favorable in CCRCs than in ADCCs. A striking finding of the present study is that one can classify with a relatively high degree of accuracy a respondent as belonging to an ADCC or a CCRC, simply based on his or her social properties (specifically, number of people who know the participant and are known by the participant). Implications Despite some similarities between CCRCs and ADCCs, CCRCs likely allow for more inclusive and active social relations. This information should be valuable to administrators and care providers. Egocentric , Long-term care , Social network analysis , Sociocentric Translational Significance Both adult day care centers (ADCCs) and continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) aim to ease loneliness while allowing older adults to age in place, but participants in ADCCs report fewer ties with other participants than members of CCRCs. ADCCs should consider incorporating social interventions that increase ties between participants.
机译:背景和目的本研究描述了以色列4个成人日托中心(ADCC)和4个继续护理退休社区(CCRC)的整个社交网络。方法每个受访者都收到了各自在ADCC或CCRC中接受服务的所有个人的姓名列表,并被要求指出他/她从列表中认识的人。我们推导出整个社交网络属性,并使用层次聚类分析对网络设置进行分组。我们进一步检查了社交网络数据将受访者归类为ADCC或CCRC成员的能力。结果在CCRC中,许多社交网络属性都比ADCC更有利。本研究的一个惊人发现是,人们可以仅基于其社交属性(具体来说,就是知道参与者的身份和年龄的人数)就可以相对较高地将其归类为ADCC或CCRC。被参与者知道)。启示尽管CCRC与ADCC之间存在一些相似之处,但CCRC可能允许更加包容和积极的社会关系。此信息对于管理员和护理提供者应该是有价值的。以自我为中心,长期护理,社会网络分析,以社会为中心的转化意义成人日托中心(ADCC)和持续护理退休社区(CCRC)都旨在缓解孤独感,同时允许老年人到位,但是ADCC参与者报告的联系减少与CCRC成员以外的其他参与者。 ADCC应该考虑纳入社会干预措施,以增强参与者之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号