首页> 外文期刊>Influenza and other respiratory viruses. >Feasibility of elementary school children’s use of hand gel and facemasks during influenza season
【24h】

Feasibility of elementary school children’s use of hand gel and facemasks during influenza season

机译:小学生在流感季节使用手胶和口罩的可行性

获取原文
           

摘要

Please cite this paper as: Allison et al. (2010) Feasibility of elementary school children’s use of hand gel and facemasks during influenza season. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(4), 223–229.Background The feasibility of non-pharmacologic interventions to prevent influenza’s spread in schools is not well known.Objectives To determine the acceptability of, adherence with, and barriers to the use of hand gel and facemasks in elementary schools.Patients and Methods Intervention: We provided hand gel and facemasks to 20 teachers and their students over 4 weeks. Gel use was promoted for the first 2 weeks; mask use was promoted for the second 2 weeks. Outcomes: Acceptability, adherence, and barriers were measured by teachers’ responses on weekly surveys. Mask use was also measured by observation.Results The weekly survey response rate ranged from 70% to 100%. Averaged over 2 weeks, 89% of teachers thought gel use was not disruptive (week 1 – 17/20, week 2 – 16/17), 95% would use gel next winter (week 1 – 19/20, week 2 – 16/17), and 97% would use gel in a pandemic (week 1 – 20/20, week 2 – 16/17). Averaged over 2 weeks, 39% thought mask use was not disruptive (week 1 – 6/17, week 2 – 6/14), 35% would use masks next winter (week 1 – 5/17, week 2 – 6/14), and 97% would use masks in a pandemic (week 1 – 16/17, week 2 – 14/14). About 70% estimated that their students used hand gel ≥4×/day for both weeks (week 1 – 14/20, week 2 – 13/17). Students’ mask use declined over time with 59% of teachers (10/17) estimating regular mask use during week 1 and 29% (4/14) during week 2. By observation, 30% of students wore masks in week 1, while 15% wore masks in week 2. Few barriers to gel use were identified; barriers to mask use were difficulty reading facial expressions and physical discomfort.Conclusions Hand gel use is a feasible strategy in elementary schools. Acceptability and adherence with facemasks was low, but some students and teachers did use facemasks for 2 weeks, and most teachers would use masks in their classroom in a pandemic.
机译:请将此论文引用为:Allison等。 (2010)在流感季节,小学生使用手胶和口罩的可行性。流感和其他呼吸道病毒,第4卷第4期,第223-229页。背景尚无众所周知的非药物干预措施来预防流感在学校的传播。目的是确定手的可接受性,坚持性和使用手感的障碍患者和方法干预:我们在4周内为20名老师和他们的学生提供了手胶和口罩。在最初的两周内促进使用凝胶;在第二个两周内推广使用口罩。结果:通过教师在每周调查中的回应来衡量可接受性,坚持性和障碍。结果还观察了口罩的使用情况。结果每周的调查回复率在70%至100%之间。平均在2周内,有89%的教师认为使用凝胶不会破坏性活动(第1-17 / 20周,第2-16 / 17周),下个冬天95%的人会使用凝胶(第1-19 / 20周,第2-16周) / 17),则有97%的人会在大流行时使用凝胶(第1 – 20/20周,第2 – 16/17周)。平均超过2周,有39%的人认为使用口罩不会造成干扰(第1 – 6/17周,第2 – 6/14周),35%的人会在明年冬天使用口罩(第1 – 5/17周,第2 – 6/14周) ),而97%的人会在大流行时使用口罩(第1-16 / 17周,第2-14 / 14周)。大约70%的学生估计他们的学生在两个星期(第1 – 14/20周,第2 – 13/17周)中每天使用≥4x的手凝胶。学生的口罩使用率随时间下降,有59%的教师(10/17)估计在第1周定期使用口罩,而在第2周的使用率为29%(4/14),通过观察,有30%的学生在第1周戴着口罩。 15%的人在第2周戴了口罩。几乎没有发现使用凝胶的障碍。使用面罩的障碍是难以阅读面部表情和身体不适。结论结论在小学阶段,使用手胶是一种可行的策略。口罩的可接受性和依从性很低,但是一些学生和老师的确使用口罩已有两个星期,而且大多数教师会在大流行的教室里使用口罩。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号