...
首页> 外文期刊>Infectious Diseases and Therapy >Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study
【24h】

Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study

机译:聚维酮碘和葡萄糖酸洗必太清洁剂在体内手卫生中的杀菌和杀病毒活性临床模拟研究

获取原文

摘要

IntroductionStandard in vitro and in vivo tests help demonstrate efficacy of hand hygiene products; however, there is no standard in vivo test method for viruses. We investigated the bactericidal and virucidal efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) 7.5% scalp and skin cleanser, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) 4% hand cleanser and the reference hand wash (soft soap) in 15 healthy volunteers following European Standard EN1499 (hygienic hand wash test method for bacteria), which was adapted for virucidal testing. MethodsSeparate test series were performed for bactericidal ( Escherichia coli ) and virucidal [murine norovirus (MNV)] testing. After pre-washing and artificial contamination of hands with test organisms, volunteers underwent testing with 3 and 5?mL of each product for contact times of 15, 30 and 60?s according to a Latin-square randomization. The number of test organisms released from fingertips into sampling fluids was assessed before and after hand washing and mean log10 reduction factor (RF) was calculated. RFs (test-reference) were compared using a Wilcoxon–Wilcox multiple comparisons test per EN1499; efficacy was concluded if p ≤?0.01. ResultsPVP-I 7.5% and CHG 4% cleansers both passed EN1499 requirements against E. coli , with statistically significantly greater ( p ≤?0.01) mean log10 RFs compared with reference soft soap across all tests (PVP-I: 4.09–5.27; CHG: 4.12–5.22; soap: 2.75–3.11). The experimental design using EN1499 was applicable to testing with MNV as discriminatory and reproducible results were generated. Mean log10 RFs of MNV were statistically significantly greater for PVP-I (1.57–2.57) compared with soft soap (1.24–1.62), while mean log10 RFs with CHG (0.90–1.34) were lower than for soft soap across all tests. ConclusionPVP-I 7.5% cleanser showed superior efficacy against MNV compared to soft soap and CHG 4% cleanser, while both PVP-I and CHG were superior to soft soap against E. coli . The experimental set-up may be applicable to future testing for antiviral hand washes. FundingMundipharma Manufacturing Pte Ltd. Plain Language SummaryPlain language summary available for this article.
机译:简介标准的体外和体内测试有助于证明手部卫生用品的功效;但是,没有标准的病毒体内测试方法。我们按照欧洲标准EN1499(15),对15名健康志愿者的聚维酮碘(PVP-1)7.5%头皮和皮肤清洁剂,葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)4%洗手液和参考洗手液(软皂)的杀菌和杀病毒功效进行了调查。细菌的卫生洗手测试方法),适用于杀菌测试。方法分别进行杀菌(大肠埃希菌)和杀病毒[鼠诺如病毒(MNV)]测试。在预先洗手并用测试生物人工污染手后,根据拉丁方的随机化方法,志愿者分别用3和5mL每种产品进行接触,15、30和60s的接触时间测试。在洗手前后评估从指尖释放到采样液中的受试生物的数量,并计算平均log 10 降低因子(RF)。 RF(测试参考)根据EN1499使用Wilcoxon-Wilcox多重比较测试进行比较;如果p≤0.01,则表明疗效。结果PVP-I 7.5%和CHG 4%清洁剂均通过了EN1499对大肠杆菌的要求,在所有测试中,平均log 10 RFs均显着高于参比标准皂(p≤?0.01)(PVP -I:4.09–5.27; CHG:4.12-5.22;肥皂:2.75-3.11)。使用EN1499进行的实验设计适用于MNV的测试,因为它产生了可辨别性和可重复性的结果。与软皂(1.24–1.62)相比,PVP-1的MNV平均log 10 RF统计学上显着更高(1.27–1.62),而CHG的平均log 10 RF在所有测试中(0.90-1.34)均低于软肥皂。结论PVP-I 7.5%清洁剂对MNV的疗效优于软皂和CHG 4%清洁剂,而PVP-1和CHG均优于对大肠杆菌的软皂。实验设置可能适用于将来抗病毒洗手的测试。 FundingMundipharma Manufacturing Pte Ltd.普通语言摘要本文提供了普通语言摘要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号