...
首页> 外文期刊>Infectious Diseases and Therapy >Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Blood Culture to Detect Candida Species in High-Risk Patients with Suspected Invasive Candidiasis: The MICAFEM Study
【24h】

Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Blood Culture to Detect Candida Species in High-Risk Patients with Suspected Invasive Candidiasis: The MICAFEM Study

机译:聚合酶链反应与血液培养检测疑似侵入性念珠菌病高危患者的念珠菌种类:MICAFEM研究

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionWe evaluated the diagnostic reliability of serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) versus blood culture, abdominal fluid or both (composite measure) in patients receiving empirical antifungal treatment for suspected invasive candidiasis. MethodsThis observational, prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in Spain enrolled 176 critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Separate blood samples for culture and serum PCR were taken before the start of antifungal therapy. Patient assessment was performed according to each site’s usual clinical practice. The primary end point was concordance between serum PCR and blood culture. Secondary end points were concordance between serum PCR and a positive abdominal fluid sample or the composite measure. Quality indices included sensitivity, specificity, positiveegative predictive values (PPV/NPV) and kappa indices. ResultsAmong 175 evaluable patients, rates of Candida detection were similar for serum PCR ( n =?16/175, 9.1%) versus blood culture ( n =?14/175, 8.0%). Quality indices for serum PCR relative to blood culture were: sensitivity 21.4%; specificity 91.9%; PPV 18.8%; NPV 93.1%; kappa index 0.125. Thirty-two abdominal fluid samples were positive. Quality indices for serum PCR versus abdominal fluid were: sensitivity 31.3%; specificity 83.0%; PPV 15.6%; NPV 92.3%; kappa index 0.100. Quality indices for serum PCR versus the composite measure were: sensitivity 15.8%; specificity 92.7%; PPV 37.5%; NPV 79.9%; kappa index 0.107. ConclusionThe sensitivity of serum PCR for Candida detection was low and the rate of concordance was low between serum PCR and the other diagnostic techniques used to identify Candida infections. Hospital-based diagnostic tests need optimising to improve outcomes in patients with suspected invasive candidiasis. FundingAstellas Pharma Inc.
机译:简介我们评估了接受经验性抗真菌治疗的可疑侵袭性念珠菌病患者的血清聚合酶链反应(PCR)与血培养,腹腔液或两者(综合测量)的诊断可靠性。方法:这项在西班牙的观察性,前瞻性,非干预性,多中心研究纳入了176名重症监护病房的危重患者。在开始抗真菌治疗之前,分别采集血样进行培养和血清PCR。根据每个站点的常规临床实践进行了患者评估。主要终点是血清PCR和血液培养之间的一致性。次要终点是血清PCR与阳性腹水样本或复合测量之间的一致性。质量指标包括敏感性,特异性,阳性/阴性预测值(PPV / NPV)和kappa指数。结果在175位可评估患者中,血清PCR的念珠菌检出率(n =?16/175,9.1%)与血液培养的n.?14/175,8.0%相似。相对于血液培养的血清PCR质量指标为:敏感性21.4%;特异性91.9%; PPV 18.8%;净现值93.1%; κ指数0.125。三十二份腹水样本呈阳性。血清PCR与腹腔积液的质量指数为:敏感性31.3%;特异性83.0%; PPV 15.6%;净现值92.3%; κ指数0.100。血清PCR与综合检测的质量指数为:敏感性15.8%;特异性92.7%; PPV 37.5%;净现值79.9%; κ指数0.107。结论血清PCR与其他鉴定念珠菌感染的诊断技术之间的敏感性较低,一致性较低。基于医院的诊断测试需要进行优化,以改善可疑浸润性念珠菌病患者的预后。资金Astellas Pharma Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号