...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of orthopaedics >Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation
【24h】

Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation

机译:混合外固定与两期最终钢板固定治疗胫骨pla骨骨折的疗效比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. This retrospective study compares the union times in cases of tibial plafond fractures managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure versus those managed with a two stage strategy with final plate fixation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study in a polytrauma referral hospital was performed between 2005 and 2011. Patients with a tibial plafond fracture, managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure or managed with a two stage strategy with the final plate fixation were included in the study. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated by two senior surgeons. Fracture healing was defined as callus bridging of one cortex, seen on both lateral and anteroposterior X-ray. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 11 points Numerical Rating Scale for pain and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score, assessed at the last followup visit. Thirteen patients had been managed with a hybrid external fixation and 18 with a two-stage strategy with the final plate fixation. There were 14 males and 17 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 19–82 years). The mean followup was 24 months (range 24–70 months). Results: The mean time from surgery to weight bearing was 7 ± 6.36 days for the hybrid fixation group and 57.43 ± 15.46 days for the plate fixation group ( P < 0.0001); and the mean time from fracture to radiological union was 133.82 ± 37.83) and 152.8 ± 72.33 days respectively ( P = 0.560). Conclusion: Besides the differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics of patients, the results of this study suggest that in cases of tibial plafond fractures, the management with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure might involve a faster union than a two-stage management with final plate fixation.
机译:背景:胫骨平台骨折通常与脚和脚踝的巨大肿胀以及开放性伤口有关。这种肿胀可能导致血流量显着减少,因此软组织的状态决定了手术适应症和植入物的类型。这项回顾性研究比较了采用混合外固定作为确定性手术治疗的胫骨骨骨折与采用最终钢板固定的两阶段策略治疗的骨折愈合时间。材料和方法:2005年至2011年在多创伤转诊医院进行了一项回顾性研究。包括胫骨平台骨折,采用混合外固定作为确定性手术治疗或采用最终钢板固定的两阶段策略治疗的患者。在研究中。两名高级外科医师对术后X光片进行了评估。骨折愈合定义为一侧和前后X线均可见的一个皮质的骨call桥接。通过11点疼痛数字评分量表和上一次随访时评估的美国骨科足踝协会踝关节评分对临床结果进行评估。 13例患者接受了混合外固定,18例采用了两阶段策略,最后进行了钢板固定。男14例,女17例,平均年龄48岁(19-82岁)。平均随访24个月(范围24-70个月)。结果:混合固定组从手术到负重的平均时间为7±6.36天,而平板固定组为57.43±15.46天(P <0.0001);从骨折到放射学结合的平均时间分别为133.82±37.83)和152.8±72.33天(P = 0.560)。结论:除两组患者在基线特征方面存在差异外,本研究结果还表明,在胫骨扁平骨折的病例中,采用混合外固定作为确定性手术的治疗可能比两阶段治疗更快的愈合速度最终固定板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号