首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Coloproctology >Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
【24h】

Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

机译:不可治愈的IV期大肠癌治疗方式生存率的多元分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare survival in patients that underwent palliative resection treatment versus non-resection for incurable colorectal cancer (ICRC). Methods The case records of 201 patients with ICRC between January 2000 and December 2009 were reviewed. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, the location of the colon cancer, histology, metastasis, treatment options and median survival were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the patients into four groups according to the treatment modalities: resection alone, resection with post-operative chemotherapy, non-resection treatment by chemotherapy alone, and stent or bypass. Median survival times were compared according to each treatment option, and the survival rates were analyzed. Results 105 patients underwent palliative resection whereas 96 were treated with non-resection modalities. A palliative resection was performed in 44 cases for resection alone and in 61 cases for resection with post-operative chemotherapy. In patients treated with non-resection of the primary tumor, chemotherapy alone was done in 65 cases and stent or bypass in 31 cases. Multivariate analysis showed a median survival of 14 months in patients with palliative resections with post-operative chemotherapy, which was significantly higher than those for chemotherapy alone (8 months), primary tumor resection alone (5 months), and stent or bypass (5 months). Gender, age, ASA score, CEA level, the location of colon cancer, histology and the presence of multiple metastases were not independent factors in association with the median survival rate. Conclusion In the treatment of ICRC, palliative resection followed by post-operative chemotherapy shows the most favorable median survival compared to other treatment options.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是比较接受姑息性切除治疗与不切除性治愈大肠癌(ICRC)患者的生存率。方法回顾2000年1月至2009年12月间201例红十字国际委员会的病历。回顾性分析了人口统计学,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)评分,癌胚抗原(CEA)水平,结肠癌的位置,组织学,转移,治疗选择和中位生存期。根据治疗方式将患者分为四类:单纯切除,术后化疗切除,单纯化疗非切除治疗,支架或搭桥术。根据每种治疗方案比较中位生存时间,并分析生存率。结果105例患者接受了姑息性切除术,其中96例接受了非切除术。单纯性切除44例,术后化疗单纯性切除61例。在未切除原发肿瘤的患者中,仅进行化疗的患者为65例,采用支架或搭桥术的为31例。多因素分析显示,姑息性切除术后接受化疗的患者中位生存期为14个月,明显高于单纯化疗(8个月),单纯原发肿瘤切除(5个月),支架或搭桥术(5个月) )。性别,年龄,ASA评分,CEA水平,结肠癌的位置,组织学和多种转移的存在不是与中位生存率相关的独立因素。结论在红十字国际委员会的治疗中,与其他治疗方案相比,姑息切除加术后化疗显示出最有利的中位生存期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号