首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of public health. >Omission of quality assurance during data entry in public health research from India: Is there an elephant in the room?
【24h】

Omission of quality assurance during data entry in public health research from India: Is there an elephant in the room?

机译:印度在公共卫生研究中输入数据时缺少质量保证:房间里有大象吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

As the adage, “Garbage in, Garbage out” goes, data entry errors may lead to erroneous results and conclusions. Quality assurance during data entry is one of the most neglected components of research and is conspicuously missing in most of the reporting standards. In this study, we reviewed research studies published in Indian Journal of Public Health and Indian Journal of Community Medicine during 2014–2016 and determined the proportion of papers reporting on quality assurance during data entry. Of 110 papers, only 6 (5.5%) papers explicitly included a statement about data quality assurance, with two studies reported to have performed double entry and validation, considered the gold standard in quality-assurance of data entry. This is highly unacceptable. We hereby appeal to the community of researchers, peer reviewers, and journal editors in India to pay attention to this important aspect of research and make reporting of quality assurance of data entry mandatory in every published paper.
机译:随着“垃圾进,垃圾出”的格言,数据输入错误可能导致错误的结果和结论。数据录入期间的质量保证是研究中最被忽略的组成部分之一,并且在大多数报告标准中都明显缺失。在这项研究中,我们回顾了2014-2016年在《印度公共卫生杂志》和《印度社区医学杂志》上发表的研究报告,并确定了在数据输入期间报告质量保证的论文比例。在110篇论文中,只有6篇(5.5%)的论文明确包含有关数据质量保证的声明,据报道有两项研究进行了两次录入和验证,被认为是保证数据录入质量的金标准。这是非常不可接受的。在此,我们呼吁印度的研究人员,同行审稿人和期刊编辑社区注意这一重要的研究内容,并在每篇已发表的论文中强制要求对数据输入的质量保证进行报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号