首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
【24h】

Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

机译:玻璃体腔注射ziv-aflibercept和贝伐单抗单药治疗单纯性多点脉络膜脉络膜血管病的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To report the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and bevacizumab (BVZ) monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 16 eyes (8 eyes each in IVZ and BVZ groups). The study period was from January 2016 to March 2018. The inclusion criteria were treatment-naive PCV patients who were treated with either IVZ or BVZ monotherapy on pro re nata protocol and followed up monthly for 6 months. The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height was measured at baseline and 6 months. Results: A total of 16 eyes were studied. IVZ group had an improvement in BCVA by 0.15 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximately 1.5 lines) at 6 months, whereas BVZ group had a reduction in BCVA by 0.21 logMAR (approximately 2 lines) (P = 0.027). Five patients and one patient in IVZ and BVZ groups, respectively, had ≥5 letters gain of BCVA. IVZ group had significant reduction in PED height (P = 0.048), whereas the change in CMT was not significant at 6 months (P = 0.681). The mean number of injections (2.87 ± 0.83 in IVZ and 2.25 ± 0.89 BVZ group; P = 0.168) and longest treatment-free interval (3.00 ± 2.20 months in IVZ and 2.12 ± 1.96 months in BVZ group; P = 0.41) were not significantly different. Conclusion: The visual and anatomical outcomes in terms of PED reduction in treatment-naive PCV patients were better in IVZ group compared with BVZ. IVZ monotherapy is a viable, cost-effective alternative in these patients with good safety profile.
机译:目的:报告玻璃体腔内齐夫-阿夫西普(IVZ)和贝伐单抗(BVZ)单药治疗未治疗的多点脉络膜脉络膜血管病(PCV)的视觉和解剖学结果。方法:这是一个回顾性病例系列,共16眼(IVZ和BVZ组各8眼)。研究期间为2016年1月至2018年3月。纳入标准为未经治疗的PCV患者,这些患者均按pronata方案接受IVZ或BVZ单药治疗,并每月随访6个月。在基线和6个月时测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA),中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和色素上皮脱离(PED)高度的变化。结果:共研究了16只眼。 IVZ组在6个月时的最小分辨角(logMAR;约1.5行)的BCVA改善了0.15个对数,而BVZ组在BCVA方面降低了0.21 logMAR的BCVA(约2行)(P = 0.027)。 IVZ和BVZ组的5例患者和1例患者的BCVA≥5个字母。 IVZ组的PED高度显着降低(P = 0.048),而6个月时CMT的变化不显着(P = 0.681)。没有平均注射次数(IVZ为2.87±0.83,BVZ组为2.25±0.89; P = 0.168)和最长的无治疗间隔时间(IVZ为3.00±2.20个月,BVZ组为2.12±1.96个月; P = 0.41)明显不同。结论:IVZ组未治疗的PCV患者在PED减少方面的视觉和解剖结局优于BVZ。对于这些具有良好安全性的患者,IVZ单一疗法是一种可行的,具有成本效益的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号