...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of orthopaedics >Interobserver variability in Pirani clubfoot severity scoring system between the orthopedic surgeons
【24h】

Interobserver variability in Pirani clubfoot severity scoring system between the orthopedic surgeons

机译:整形外科医生之间皮拉尼马蹄内翻足严重度评分系统中观察者间的差异

获取原文

摘要

Background: Congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) is one of the most common congenital pediatric orthopedic foot deformity, which varies in severity and clinical course. Assessment of severity of the club foot deformity is essential to assess the initial severity of deformity, to monitor the progress of treatment, to prognosticate, and to identify early relapse. Pirani's scoring system is most acceptable and popular for club foot deformity assessment because it is simple, quick, cost effective, and easy. Since the scoring system is subjective in nature it has inter- and intra-observer variability, it is widely used. Hence, the interobserver variability between orthopedic surgeons in assessing the club foot severity by Pirani scoring system. Materials and Methods: We assessed the interobserver variability between five orthopedic surgeons of comparable skills, in assessing the club foot severity by Pirani scoring system in 80 feet of 60 children (20 bilateral and 40 unilateral) with club foot deformity. All the five different orthopedic surgeons were familiar with Pirani clubfoot severity scoring and Ponseti cast manipulation, as they had already worked in CTEV clinics for at least 2 months. Each of them independently scored, each foot as per the Pirani clubfoot scoring system and recorded total score (TS), Midfoot score (MFS), Hind foot score (HFS), posterior crease (PC), emptiness of heel (EH), rigidity of equnius (RE), medial crease (MC), curvature of lateral border (CLB), and lateral head of talus (LHT). Interobserver variability was calculated using kappa statistic for each of these signs and was judged as poor (0.00–0.20), fair (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), substantial (0.61–0.80), or almost perfect (0.81–1.00). Results: The mean age was 137 days (range 21-335) days. The mean Pirani score was 3.86. We found the overall consistency to be substantial for overall score (total score kappa - 0.71) and also for midfoot (0.68) and hindfoot (0.66) separately. The consistency was least for the emptiness of heel (kappa - 0.39), and best for rigidity of equnius (kappa - 0.68) and rest of the parameters were moderate (kappa between 0.40 and 0.60). Conclusion: The Pirani scoring system had got substantial reliability in assessing the clubfoot deformity even when the reliability test was extended to five different orthopedic surgeons simultaneously.
机译:背景:先天性talipes equinovarus(马蹄内翻足)是最常见的先天性小儿骨科足部畸形之一,其严重程度和临床过程各不相同。评估俱乐部脚畸形的严重性对于评估畸形的初始严重性,监测治疗的进展,进行预后并确定早期复发至关重要。 Pirani的计分系统简单,快速,经济高效且易于使用,是俱乐部球杆畸形评估中最受欢迎的方法。由于评分系统本质上是主观的,它具有观察者之间和观察者内部的可变性,因此被广泛使用。因此,在骨科医生之间通过皮拉尼评分系统评估球杆严重程度时,观察者之间存在差异。材料和方法:我们评估了五名具有类似技能的整形外科医师之间的观察者间差异,通过皮拉尼评分系统评估了60例儿童(20例双侧和40例单侧)足部畸形的80英尺足部严重程度。五位不同的整形外科医生都已熟悉皮拉尼(Pirani)马蹄内翻足的严重程度评分和庞塞提(Ponseti)石膏操作,因为他们已经在CTEV诊所工作了至少2个月。他们每个人都独立计分,每只脚都按照皮拉尼俱乐部的脚计分系统,并记录总分(TS),中足分(MFS),后足分(HFS),后折痕(PC),后跟空度(EH),刚度马(RE),内侧折痕(MC),外侧边界弯曲(CLB)和距骨外侧头(LHT)的角度。观察者之间的变异性是使用卡伯统计来计算的,并被判断为差(0.00–0.20),中度(0.21-0.40),中度(0.41-0.60),严重(0.61-0.80)或接近完美(0.81- 1.00)。结果:平均年龄为137天(21-335天)。皮拉尼平均得分为3.86。我们发现整体一致性对于整体得分(总得分kappa-0.71)以及中足(0.68)和后足(0.66)而言是重要的。对于后跟的空度,一致性最低(kappa-0.39),对马蹄动物的刚度一致性最佳(kappa-0.68),其余参数中等(kappa在0.40至0.60之间)。结论:即使同时将可靠性测试扩展到五名不同的骨科医生,皮拉尼评分系统在评估马蹄畸形方面也具有相当高的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号